sadoldgit

siouxsie

I know you well enough C B Fry. Not only have I had to put up with your behaviour here and on other threads but several other posters have been at the end of your attempts to belittle them. It has been going on for years. I am surprised you haven't been banned. People have certainly been banned for a lot less. Keep lying? You and Hypo make a cute couple. I notice that you let the obvious racists alone. I would have thought that they would have been an obvious target for a man of your standing and integrity? But no, you go after a moderate. Why is that? You are just another playground bully. By the way, you accused me of running away yet you do not answer your PMs. Isnt that avoidance or "running away" in C B fry and Hypo parlance? Oh, and I have taken both you and Hypo off of my ignore list, so how is that "running away?"

It is like being back in the playground with you Hypo. You really need to grow up. Again, you seem to be copying the guy you to emulate. Run away from a computer screen? LOL.

harpy

Continue to have a pop Hypo. I notice you still haven't answered my questions but then you only come on here to have a dig at people don't you? You really are no better than CB Fry.

Whatever. I would rather be me than you CB. You are a very sad, deluded and self important individual. If anyone who I respected on here criticised me then I would worry.

Many, how many exactly? I suspect some of them just jumped on the Hypo bandwagon. Certainly Guan did. No there is no hope because you only see what you want to see. You also conveniently do not answer questions you don't want to answer. You just keep on with this obsession of yours. Really. You need to leave it now. It is not healthy.

I was accused of running away by your buddy CB Fry but not with my fingers in my ears. It was rather odd as I hadn't gone anywhere. I asked for evidence because I thought I might be able to stop all of this but I was clearly wrong. You just go on and on and on. Don't you ever get fed up with it? I am seriously concerned about what you get out of this odd behaviour?

Not just that they are trying to get rid of him, but also no one else seems to be beating a path to WHL to sign him up!

Just reading this as they have announced it on the Radio 2 news! Fair play to him and I hope he does well at Boro.

A little word in your ear Hypo. I am not on trial here. This is just an internet football forum. If you chose to see me in a certain light that is your prerogative. For the sake of your own sanity, I would suggest that you ignore my posts in future. I am worried about you. This obsession isn't normal.

Serious question Hypo. Do you have OCD?

An awful lot? They cant have been that bothered because they didn't hang around too long. Griffo has clearly got an agenda. I really don't know what Whelk was on about half the time. I would ask you, if these people don't have an issue with Muslims, why have a problem with someone who clearly doesn't have a problem with Muslims?

Why? People only seem to post if they have a problem with something. I am sure we will hear if you have more support though.

David, I do recall reading somewhere before he signed that Osvaldo was a bit of a handful to manage but Poch thought he could tame him! As for Ramirez, I think he is a decent player but just not suited to the Premiership.

hindu

I will give you a hand... Hypochondriac, CB Fry, Sour Mash, Batman. See a pattern yet? Oh and you can through Guan in there as he got upset when I called him on posting disrespectful pictures (I wasn't alone by the way, there were other complaints about that posting direct to the Mods).

No 12. If you read it in context I was taking the **** about Griffos post.

First batch of points from Hypo no 10. I ask the leading question "So you believe that all Muslims are gun toting suicide bombers?" Griffo replies "No, but a hell of a lot of them hold views similar. How can they not when it is written in their book?" Shame you missed out the context Hypo.

Name all of these posters please. Given the number of people who have viewed this thread I would say that you guys are in a small minority.

Hypo responses part two. Your post timed 01.52 #0 1. Hyperbole 2. The stats had been presented in a way that was pejorative towards Mulsims. The poll was actually positive towards Muslims but that is not the way it was presented. 3.It might be amusing to you. The only evidence you have seems to stem from your apparent complete ignorance of how discussions often work. 4.The Sun used a poll to show Muslims in a bad light. The results were posted here. The reference to kill all Muslims came from an earlier use of hyberbole. 5. Erm. Yep. 6. Not doing very well so far pal. 7. See above. 8. It would if I could be bothered to go back and find it. 9. Fine, if that is what you think. 10. I didn't say it was you. I said it was either you are Soured Mash. 11. Not unable. I couldn't be bothered to humour you. Big difference. 12. See above. 13. See above. You can assume all you like but I am afraid that assumptions do not count as evidence. So then, I know I am not very good at the internet malarkey but so far I would say that you haven't managed to show my ignorance of religious matters or that I constantly make things up.

Thanks for the pointer. I will go back and check the posts that I haven't responded to yet. It might be clear to you Hypo but then you are a special kind of guy

This is for Hypo, I suggest the rest of you ignore it unless you aren't easily bored. Hypos post at 01.08 #0 1. I didn't say anyone said that did I? I was using hyperbole. 2.When I suggested the peace would come about through negotiations I was told that it would never happen with IS. I stand by what I said. If all you do is kill all you get is death. Not sure how that fits in with making things up? 3.In an earlier exchange you were saying that the only way to deal with these terrorists (IS in particular) was to kill them as they would never negotiate. It seems a reasonable attempt to paraphrase what I thought you were saying. Dod you come back at the time and say that want what you were saying? 4.I took what you said from our earlier discussion that the only option we had was to fight them. Did I get that wrong? 5. Look at what I said before your highlighted segment. "What is the alternative?" I then go on to pose a possible response. 6.What was I being ridiculed for then because my position has been pretty much that from the begging of this thread? 7. It may have been pointless but I said I would do my best. What here have I been making up exactly? 8.And thousands of people have suggested negotiations and or sanctions. In what way am I making anything up here? 9. I don't understand your point. What have I made up exactly? Hadnt we established tat both religions have had their share of abhorrent behaviour over the years? 10. I cant be bothered to scroll all the way back to find this post but I am sure they would have responded if they felt the need. Hyperbole. 11. Clutching at straws again. The giveaway here is "you cant tell me." It is a device often used in discussions to help move things on. 12. Give me the post number and I shall respond as I cant recall the context. Thanks. 13. Again, probably hyperbole but if you give the post number I can give you a better response. 14. I guess when I answer the ones above it will cover this one? 15. What have I made up here? I am "suggesting" the problem is terrorists and not religions per se. 16.Post number please? 17. Stating the obvious is often used in discussions and I am sure you have done it yourself in order to make a point? What have I made up here? 18.Batman not able to respond for himself? I asked him a question. He could always reply no. Again it is a technique used in discussions in order to try and determine someone's position. 19. What have I made up here exactly?

Yes I do have the time thanks. We seem to both have a lot of time on our hands don't we? The question isn't so much do I have the time but more can I be ars*d. As you have gone to so much trouble the least I can do is respond so I will in the hope that it will get you off my back once and for all It could take a while but there are several where you seem never to have had a chat in a pub about issues of the day so I might, for the sake of brevity, refer to previous answers. Just so we are clear you are accusing me of making things up (or lying) and having no sense of religious affairs? You will excuse me if I don't go back to the source of every example as although I have time I don't have that much time. It would have been easier if the quotes had there reference numbers but I will do the best I can for you. Oh and I might use the word hyperbole so if you don't understand its use now might be a good time to acquaint yourself with the word and its use in a discussion.

If I were you Lets B, I would sue the charm school. I assume you are the same Lets B who appears on Sotonians? You have the same delightful way about you.