ErwinK1961

Ok Fabrizio, thanks for the update.

They also had this story yesterday. There is a world outside the forum where you can find information. If you’d checked that, you’d have seen that Arsenal have said they’d want an option / obligation if they were to loan Ramsdale out as they wanted a sale. So if (and still not convinced it’s true) we’re pushing for him on loan, it was always going to need an option or obligation as Arsenal want him sold.

Old news FFS, keep up.

So a striker, Ramsdale AND O’Riley? Think you’ll be disappointed

That’s Betis and Marseille that he’s allegedly been about to move to that has fallen through, got to wonder why.

I’m saying Sky are a week behind, not you old chap.

If our three strikers all score double figures we’ll be fine! When was the last time that happened?

This feels like a week old news, we’ve moved onto the Dutch chap. Ramsdale won’t be coming here

Don’t see much wrong with his prediction tbh. We've got a lot to prove still. One thing I did take umbrage with; Reds supporters will take confidence from the fact Forest have avoided defeat in their last six outings away at Southampton (at The Dell or St Mary’s) Must have dreamt the 3-2 home win in our promotion season.

This would be a good move / stance if we were an established premier league side. Right now, it’s cutting us financially when we need all the money we can to try and stay up.

What do you mean we will buy him in a year? It says we are buying him as part of the Alcaraz deal.

Hmm, when we’re sailing close to the PSR line and every penny we have really needs to go towards trying to stay up, wasting £7-10m on a fee to the benefit of Goztepe I don’t get. Dont mind freebies or cheap gambles, but this feels like a step too far.

It says we sign him as part of the Alcaraz sale and then we’re loaning him to Goztepe? So we’re taking a haircut on our incoming fee for Alcaraz to benefit Goztepe.

Fcking ridiculous.

He was a bit hard done by here TBH. When he first came in, he filled in a bit at CB and RB, don’t think he ever really had a run in his preferred defensive midfield position. The fee we paid seemed to effect the fans views of him, wasnt his fault we overpaid. I think there’s a player in there and a season with you guys playing regularly will do both sides a world of good.

It’s been a positive window for sure, but we’re still very short in the final third at the moment.

Don’t really see the point of swapping a decent attacking midfield prospect for another. Would rather have the money and buy someone who will be a regular

That’s mental money.

Signing JWP on loan would also mean a GK would be unlikely/harder. We’re not signing one permanently, so would be restricted to a foreign loan

Not sure there’s room for him TBH.

Wonder if City would consider selling McAtee? Could he be an MOR alternative? Would help us continue to morph into Sheff Utd MKII

It’s probably one of those aggregator Saints X accounts that have badged it up as news. Ignoring the fact that it references Brentford, Fulham and Forest as well, with no substance behind it whatsoever.

Not a chance we’re signing Targett on loan FFS. It’s a nothing article.

Looks like Arsenal are getting their Ramsdale replacement, so he will def be on the move. Who knows how much money we’ve got, but if we can do it then I’d pay the loan fee with an option to buy if we stay up (THB esque). Would he go for that though, probably not.