Gemmel Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm not sure if they are one of the same, but; 1) FL withdrawing us from league one 2) Disappearing completely / Winding the club up I can't help but think we weren't a million miles off with the first one. Knowing we wouldn't beable to trade for too much longer and the time it takes to get these things done (Even when rushed through) The FL must have started to put in place some sort of contingency plan of withdrawing us from the league. As for going bust completely, even if we were wound up, we have come back in some guise, Blue square, or whatever.... it probably would have never been the same and i guess it's all irrelevant now, but would be interesting to know, just how close we really came. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 (edited) Retrospective scaremongering posts should be banned IMO Edited 8 July, 2009 by saint_stevo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmel Posted 8 July, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 July, 2009 Retrospective scaremongering messages should be banned IMO saint stevo should be banned in IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Charteris Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 Not so close to no. 2. You'll always find vultures circling around a dying beast (and, no, I don't mean you Herr Liebherr!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nineteen Canteen Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm not sure if they are one of the same, but; 1) FL withdrawing us from league one 2) Disappearing completely / Winding the club up I can't help but think we weren't a million miles off with the first one. Knowing we wouldn't beable to trade for too much longer and the time it takes to get these things done (Even when rushed through) The FL must have started to put in place some sort of contingency plan of withdrawing us from the league. As for going bust completely, even if we were wound up, we have come back in some guise, Blue square, or whatever.... it probably would have never been the same and i guess it's all irrelevant now, but would be interesting to know, just how close we really came. I'm sensing you're not happy with with our new owner and trying to assess if there was still time for another twist to suit your agenda. No disrespect just a feeling I am getting from you and a few others. One thing is for sure with a sole owner their will be no more fan influenced musical chairs and decision making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmel Posted 8 July, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm sensing you're not happy with with our new owner and trying to assess if there was still time for another twist to suit your agenda. No disrespect just a feeling I am getting from you and a few others. One thing is for sure with a sole owner their will be no more fan influenced musical chairs and decision making. WTF .....i'm over the f0oking moon. What agenda? I've waited a lot longer than 97 days for today to happen and couldn't be happier with the outcome. Lay off them....drugs are still illegal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 well Gemmel, just seems a pretty negative thread son Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm sensing you're not happy with with our new owner and trying to assess if there was still time for another twist to suit your agenda. No disrespect just a feeling I am getting from you and a few others. One thing is for sure with a sole owner their will be no more fan influenced musical chairs and decision making. Shut up troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 saint stevo should be banned in IMO People calling for Saint Stevo to be banned for suggesting that retrospective scaremongering posts should be banned should be banned. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SB Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm sensing you're not happy with with our new owner and trying to assess if there was still time for another twist to suit your agenda. No disrespect just a feeling I am getting from you and a few others. One thing is for sure with a sole owner their will be no more fan influenced musical chairs and decision making. I'm sensing you're a cu' nt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nineteen Canteen Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm sensing you're a cu' nt? I'm sensing you're not relevant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 8 July, 2009 Share Posted 8 July, 2009 I'm not sure if they are one of the same, but; 1) FL withdrawing us from league one 2) Disappearing completely / Winding the club up I can't help but think we weren't a million miles off with the first one. Knowing we wouldn't beable to trade for too much longer and the time it takes to get these things done (Even when rushed through) The FL must have started to put in place some sort of contingency plan of withdrawing us from the league. As for going bust completely, even if we were wound up, we have come back in some guise, Blue square, or whatever.... it probably would have never been the same and i guess it's all irrelevant now, but would be interesting to know, just how close we really came. Dont know about 1 but pretty damn close to 2. The break up value was far more than most could afford to pay. We nearly got put in the blender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now