The Spygate Saga

[saintant]

2 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

Blackmore "overwhelming feeling we won't find anything until September until after the International break. Feeling the club think that too".

If true that's just plain ridiculous.

[hypochondriac]

5 minutes ago, Saint Pete said:

If that's true, it begs the question what on earth will the FA be doing between now and September in order to come to their judgement that they couldn't have done already in the last 2 and a half months?! It's nuts that they took 2 months just to charge him when most/all of the facts were already known in May! 

Sounds like that other bloke on here was right about now having a second hearing after the previous one which led to the charges. Either we are admitting the charges or contesting some and pleading mitigation maybe? Absurd really.

[Willo of Whiteley]

September, then December, then March, then we clinch the title with four games to go in April and the FA then come out and ban him and deduct us ten points for him being in charge.

[benjii]

I think a delay is good. We need to start the season strongly so let's kick it as far down the road as we can.

[hypochondriac]

1 hour ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

September, then December, then March, then we clinch the title with four games to go in April and the FA then come out and ban him and deduct us ten points for him being in charge.

Edit wrong thread

Edited 14 hours ago by hypochondriac

[sfc4prem]

21 minutes ago, benjii said:

I think a delay is good. We need to start the season strongly so let's kick it as far down the road as we can.

Agreed. 

Then mount a fucking massive Manchester-on-Arabia esque legal challenge when they ban him for 10 matches.

20 years later, they'll give him the 10-match touchline ban.

[Fabrice29]

On 01/08/2026 at 02:03, MB said:

For all the haters out there, things change… Chelsea took centre stage with their punishment, we will hear imminently

choose what you what to believe I really don’t care! My track record has been pretty much on the money 

 

 

Haters gonna hate.

[Ted Bates Statue]

5 hours ago, westmidlandsaint said:

Makes you think though doesn't it how the EFL managed to investigate, disciplinary hearing and appeal so quickly yet the FA have had 3 months and still no decision!! 

I'm wondering when we were slapped with the initial decision, why didn't we ask to separate the appeal for the points deduction, for it to be heard at a later date in the very distant future. There was no need to get a 24-hour verdict on that particular aspect.

[egg]

12 hours ago, Saint Pete said:

If that's true, it begs the question what on earth will the FA be doing between now and September in order to come to their judgement that they couldn't have done already in the last 2 and a half months?! It's nuts that they took 2 months just to charge him when most/all of the facts were already known in May! 

I'm not sure all the facts were known. We admitted three specific episodes, and the tribunal made certain findings. Whether the FA are investigating whether Tonda did anything else, we don't know, but that's the only reason I can think of for the prolonged delay. 

[egg]

9 hours ago, Ted Bates Statue said:

I'm wondering when we were slapped with the initial decision, why didn't we ask to separate the appeal for the points deduction, for it to be heard at a later date in the very distant future. There was no need to get a 24-hour verdict on that particular aspect.

The punishment was a package, so any appeal would address all issues together. 

The timing point is being made out as an issue that it isn't. As the appellant, you want an urgent appeal, not a delay - you want a wrong rectified without delay. Same day or short delay appeals are common.

There shouldn't be a need to spend ages preparing for an appeal of that sort. Our case was that the panel got it wrong based on the evidence, the rules and any precedent. Any credible legal team should know how they say the panel got it wrong, and be able to take that into an urgent appeal. 

[EssEffCee]

16 minutes ago, egg said:

I'm not sure all the facts were known. We admitted three specific episodes, and the tribunal made certain findings. Whether the FA are investigating whether Tonda did anything else, we don't know, but that's the only reason I can think of for the prolonged delay. 

Surely the investigation part is done now he's been charged? They should have already done all of that looking into other instances.

[egg]

12 minutes ago, EssEffCee said:

Surely the investigation part is done now he's been charged? They should have already done all of that looking into other instances.

No idea mate, I'm just trying to think of a logical reason for the ridiculous delay. If they're proceeding based on the same incidents as the EFL, it should be quick and easy. All a bit odd.