Griffo Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Right. I have read through many of the threads and I don't really know what's going on.. I know that SLH have gone into admin and this may or may not affect the club but that's about it. Could someone explain very briefly and simply what is going on, and what Rupert and Wilde's positions are now etc etc.. Thanks in advance, unless this gets locked which I presume it may. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 I hear ya, but I think we are all in the dark still! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stanthemanfairoak Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 I hear ya' date=' but I think we are all in the dark still![/quote']the darkness now theirs a good band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John B Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Right. I have read through many of the threads and I don't really know what's going on.. I know that SLH have gone into admin and this may or may not affect the club but that's about it. Could someone explain very briefly and simply what is going on, and what Rupert and Wilde's positions are now etc etc.. Thanks in advance, unless this gets locked which I presume it may. I thought you were going to tell I have been on and off the forum and have little clue SLH seems to be going in to Administration but not SFC what that means I dont know although there appear to be potential buyers But Lowe is still hated by lots of posters seems to be the one fact I am sure of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank's cousin Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Pancakes post on the facts sums it up - only 3 posts as we still know very little for sure or what it all means... fair to say we have had betterdays though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wopper Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 As the shares are worthless Lowe & Wilde are nobodys at the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Saint Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 more simple = simpler simple (regular) - simpler (comparative) - simplest (superlative) HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griffo Posted 1 April, 2009 Author Share Posted 1 April, 2009 More simple is still correct I believe. Was there really any need for that? Tit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSaint75 Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 From what I make of it at the moment, Lowe now has no say in how the club is run, the administrator is now responsible for all decisions on how it will pay back the creditors, I assume SFC are an asset to sell along with anything else SLH owns. As for points deduction, I can't see us getting away with it unless somebody buys us quickly. I assume Wilde is in his supposed role of SFC chairman for the moment at least, and his shares and all other are worthless unless there is some dosh left over from the sale of assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 From what i've read things will move quickly now with a decision made as early as tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponty Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 more simple = simpler simple (regular) - simpler (comparative) - simplest (superlative) HTH Generally speaking, you'll only find "simpler" as the sole comparative adjective of "simple" in an American text. In English both forms are acceptable, although "more simple" actually follows the rules on words containing two or more syllables. Here's an English reference showing both forms. http://learnenglish.ecenglish.com/lessons/comparative-adjectives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 From what I make of it at the moment, Lowe now has no say in how the club is run, the administrator is now responsible for all decisions on how it will pay back the creditors, I assume SFC are an asset to sell along with anything else SLH owns. As for points deduction, I can't see us getting away with it unless somebody buys us quickly. I assume Wilde is in his supposed role of SFC chairman for the moment at least, and his shares and all other are worthless unless there is some dosh left over from the sale of assets. I am led to believe that Lowe, Wilde and Cowen are no longer at the Club in any capacity and the administrator will be calling the shots (think Jones may be there as continuity) going forward. The PLC will be in administration and the administrator will be looking to sell all assets, including the Football Club to any interested parties. If a buyer can't be found, then things may well start to look somewhat different!!!!!! No real ITK, just pieceing things together from various snippets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John B Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 I am led to believe that Lowe, Wilde and Cowen are no longer at the Club in any capacity and the administrator will be calling the shots (think Jones may be there as continuity) going forward. The PLC will be in administration and the administrator will be looking to sell all assets, including the Football Club to any interested parties. If a buyer can't be found, then things may well start to look somewhat different!!!!!! No real ITK, just pieceing things together from various snippets. Crouch had £2million to spare a few months ago could he buy the club I wonder? Although he must have lost a lot because of his shares Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladysaint Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Does that mean that they keep the manager and he reports to the administrator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John B Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Does that mean that they keep the manager and he reports to the administrator. The club may be sold prior to the administration but the administrator runs the PLC instead of Lowe Cowan and Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Saint Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Generally speaking, you'll only find "simpler" as the sole comparative adjective of "simple" in an American text. In English both forms are acceptable, although "more simple" actually follows the rules on words containing two or more syllables. Here's an English reference showing both forms. http://learnenglish.ecenglish.com/lessons/comparative-adjectives Interesting, but it still doesn't sound correct to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSaint75 Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 Does that mean that they keep the manager and he reports to the administrator. The manager will report to the Chairmen (wilde) for the time being anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 The manager will report to the Chairmen (wilde) for the time being anyway I hear Wilde's gone!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSaint75 Posted 1 April, 2009 Share Posted 1 April, 2009 I hear Wilde's gone!!! Will anyone notice? He has lost all his money so he might as well be gone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now