Ex Lion Tamer

It does but also shows a willingness to face facts and move on. How many times have I read on here that the club will stick with e.g. Bazunu out of pride and refuse to admit they're wrong - not true actually

I will say that his performance as a manager doesn't have much relevance to whether he's a good assistant. Look at Steve Wigley, he was assistant manager when we were excellent under Strachan but he was never a manager. Or Stuart Gray, who supported Glenn Hoddle during a great period but was hopeless stepping up

Not my era but as others have said, Fisher looked really great here

We tried to sign Gakpo for big money that summer and he wouldn't come. While I broadly agree that we should have spent more on strikers over the last few years, it's not that easy to bring in £40m calibre players. And even if they do come there's no guarantee they won't flop, meaning even more money is wasted

They brought in mostly good players this summer to be fair. The problem was they didn't bring in a keeper and their big striker signing was a huge flop

A couple of good players in January and we can easily get promoted through the playoffs

I remember how convinced people were that we wouldn't get promoted this time two years ago

It's pretty obvious that we find it hard to break teams down when they sit back against us. Add a proper striker and a goalkeeper to that game and we probably would have won

If we called it a 3-4-3 then maybe people would get it a bit more. There might also be a case for a full back to go into the back three to make it more attacking (Roerslev?). As has been done many times in the past, e.g. Gary Neville for England. I think Ryan Bertrand did it for us previously?

There's always West Ham to solve that problem

The club have all the power. Local journalists are totally reliant on them for access and stories, so they can't rock the boat too much. And to be fair, why would they allow a local journalist to undermine the confidence of a fragile goalkeeper? It's counterproductive.

People like to dismiss stats but if a 20yo striker has 10 goals in 29 games in Bundesliga 2 then they're going to have to improve a lot to step up to the Championship. At best he's a long term project, more likely just a bad signing

He's hungry apparently, posted this a few days ago: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSX6mbljQpP/?igsh=MW5reTZ6dm10a3dmYQ== Honestly I think he's one of the few players who could have made a difference off the bench against Coventry - he badly lacks end product but can go past players like they're not there, which is useful against a team parking the bus

I kind of thought the club was quite stat driven but did that stop a few years ago? Is the fabled Black Box a thing of the past?

I think we had a limited budget and decided to strengthen other parts of the squad

I'm not saying it will definitely happen but the club will be doing the right thing to delay a decision and the player will of course be hoping for the best

The club will no doubt see if he can prove his fitness in the second half of the season before making a decision. His last hope is that he can stay fit if his minutes are managed - remember he played three games in a week before his latest setback

Bear in mind that Charlie Kelman scored 21 goals for Orient last season and has managed two for Charlton in the Championship this year

They achieved their objective of getting a big pay day. People on here will tell us it was worth it because he could get a career ending injury any time and needed to chase the money. He clearly should have stayed with us for a season

There wasn't anyone to pass to most of the time because Coventry had parked the bus. It was actually players waiting for an opportunity rather than playing a pass to would inevitably fail. Either that or a lack of movement off the ball

Downes seemed to win every 50/50 tussle he was involved in second half. Thought he was useful

I wonder if there's anything to be said about 1) the quality of fitness following Still's preseason and 2) the intensity the players are playing in the first half of games

You can say this of any manager/team: we may have done well against weaker teams but we will find it harder against the stronger teams.

Be specific about who we should have brought in. I was sceptical about hiring someone so unproven but also not enthused by any of the other names being put forward. In that context you might as well go for the guy who is winning almost every game (by wide margins a lot of the time)

You have to believe that a 32 year old manager in his first major job might be able to learn and improve their in game management