StuRomseySaint

People judging what people should and shouldn't drink at losers that have to follow the crowd as they have no personality themselves. Now I am not saying I normally drink WKD because I like the taste of beerm much more... but 3 bottles for £5 was an offer not to be refused.

See it's people like you and Stevo that are the fags... I don't drink certain drinks because they are fashionable or to look cool... I drink them to help me get smashed. At that point I had downed 12 pints of fizzy lager and felt a bit bloated so switched to some coctails then a couple of WKDS before switching back on to the beers. - It's called drinking responsibly. :cool:

WKD? A refreshing 30 minute break from copius amounts of lager. A good call I think.

I will f'sure. I am still fookin hanging from the sesh on Saturday though. And due to who I spent the evening with, you most definately do wish you were me c*ntio. :cool:

The non-fatties kind of go with my drinking, the more ****ed I get, the more my standards drop, so they tend to go hand in hand.

Eating is cheating. All I had all day was a packed of Salt and Vinegar chips and a portion of popcorn chicken. :cool:

Just done a test, I consumed 49 units of alcohol on Saturday... the reccomended weekly allowance is 21. That is actually quite scary! I think it is time I gave my body a rest. :shock:

I think I am going to have a warm up run between now and Wembley, I have realise now the ridiculous amount of beers I get through on a matchday... for the purpose of the blog I am going to do... I tried to keep track of the amount of alcohol consumed on Saturday and was quite shocked. By 2:45pm I had consumed 8 pints of beer. Another 2 pints at half-time. 2 more in the pub after then up to Que Pasa, 2 Mojhitos and 3 bottles of WKD ( I was bloated so needed a rest )... Then at 7pm off to Players in Totton for the rest of the night... I lost track of how many beers I had drunk by this point. I would say at a conservative estimate, it must have been another 8 or so, was in there for 5 hours. I am sure that is not good for your body.

No, nobody is wearing colours. That is all.

If you have spoken to him and passed your details then you are in, he won't send confirmation unless you request it.

The ones in the photo are in there for a reason... because the police don't know who they are... I have heard that up to now, there is another 30 waiting to be nicked. The p*mpey football intelligence officers where at the game yesterday and profiling people at the Plume as well.

He is right, it was a setup imo. The police want rid of a certain few characters, they knew it would kick off by letting the fans out together... what did they do? Took a couple of steps back and filmed in. There will be a total of around 50 arrests and banning orders over what was a non-event... almost 3 times as many as there was at West Ham v Millwall. Explain that one.

He was smashed, they refused him entry, he walked away for 5 minutes and had another go at getting in and was then arrested... no struggle, no assaulting police, no resisting arrest, no bad language, no opposition fan in sight. That is 100% true. I was there. Banning orders can be handed out with little or no justification. And in alot of cases, they are.

To be fair, some of them in the 11 are skates... the images are in their local rag as well. But yes, the new tactic is get as many banned as possible, they knew it was going to kick off outside, and stood back with cameras, I feel sorry for the non savvy lads that were hurling stuff at the skates in full view of the 'cops with cameras' ... they are going to be dishing out banning orders like jelly at a kids party.

One mate got a 3 year banning order simply for 'entering a football stadium whilst under the influence of alcohol' No violence, not even a swear word, not an opposition fan in sight... 3 year ban.

Why don't you go wash your hair if you have nothing better to do? Pah. :-)

It would be cheaper, as I said earlier, if they decide to build a new stadium, it won't be to increase the capacity... although it will probably be around 40,000 I reckon. It will be to build a self-sufficient stadium which includes hotels, offices and leisure facilities which will cover the running costs of the football stadium. People keep harping on about the capacity... but St Marys has minimal potential revenue streams, if they are here for the long haul, then it would be in their best interests to build a new 'complex' .

Exactly, you snooze, you lose. I bought my MK Dons ticket in my old mans name... I knew I had 2 in the bag for being a STH, so by buying one in his name ( which I used, he hasn;t been to a non-corporate Saints game for a few years ) I bagged myself an extra ticket. Anyone who REALLY wanted a ticket would have got one, there was plenty of loopholes to exploit.

I suggest you do, then you might get a grasp on my reply.

Oh dear, I didn't think I would need to explain this, but for the special people I will. Carlisle where allocated 44,500 tickets, they decided to take 24,500 of them as they knew they wouldn't be able to sell them all. If they had sold their 24,500.... do you think they wouldn't be able to have any more tickets? If Carlisle could sell 44,500 then they would also be allowed that allocation... In summary... That is how I see the allocation as half and half. For some stupid reason Wembley wasn't built for segregation which could be moved on demand... shame. If it was Saints v Leeds then it would have been a 90,000 sellout, with corporates taking the rest.

Less of the wang eye sunshine... it's common knowledge I had that sorted 2 years ago. :cool:

Yes, yes we are. :-)

There are much easier ways of ensuring that you don't have to be deployed or get out of the army than going to court for nicking a couple of quid off one person ad 60p off another.

Luckily he will have his time in Afghan to kill some more rag heads and defend Queen and Country. God bless him. x

Sorry, but don't you think if there was a serious assault in there then the Echo would have reported it? And if there was a serious assault then there would also have been a charge for that as well?