-
Posts
6,835 -
Joined
Everything posted by 70's Mike
-
except SLH small business, after all me and my fellow directors have just had to put our houses up as guarantee for our business overdraft, as are many small business men around the uk at present. Shame the owners of SLH do not show any confidence in their business
-
IN Theory problem is none of the b**tards will sell
-
and that just shows why the plc status is a farce, we have 60% plus of the shares in the hands of 10 people. i am still struggling to understand the benefits to the FOOTBALL club
-
think that shirt was in the keegan era not BT OR MLT
-
imo we need at least 2 wins to keep in contact with the pack
-
aSaints stay up b) Lowe to sell his shares to MLT who becomes Chairman with Trevor Birch as CEO We would still have no money but would be a club united , even if there is only 15000 of us.
-
almost like the cup final odds back against the wall nothing to lose lets go for it
-
do not always agree with Nick but the cheer did seem louder yesterday and it was a better performance but we should not kid ourselves a) Reading are not a typical CCC side they always try and play the ball on the ground and are not full of 6ft hoofers b) the crowd are like a volcano at present and a poor performance in the next league game and it will errupt
-
ONE question why was it not renewed
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
70's Mike replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
do not think that is possible with Ruperts group, he must have some good photos of the rest of the spineless ones -
did not count but no of three season ticket holders, in my family, who were not there. Front of Northam and back of Chapel were empty
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
70's Mike replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
re last paragraph not sure if some of them would like it if protest is outside as they are going in for their free lunch before getting their free programme to read in their free seat , not forgetting their free drinks. How come i get nothing free as a shareholder? -
i suppose it takes time to phone his leader and decide wether it is lunatic fringe, flat caps or peasants he will be having a pop at
-
totally agree but i do not intend to let my wanting lowe out spoil a good performance TODAY. if there is any sort of organized protest next week i will support it but tonight i am a little bit happier
-
Somedunce said something about a holiday anyway he only posts when most have gone to bed
-
Agreed i was impressed that both forwards started to chase a few lost causes which led to mistakes by the Reading back 4
-
surprised it was that number looked about 17k to me
-
agree about Holmes changing sides i suppose it was because JP does not think BWP can play on the right
-
your just over complicating it, it was imo 4-4-2 and on some occassions almost 4-2-4
-
or we have no money
-
Disagree about Gillett because of the way he played holding the midfield we were able virtually to play with 4 forwards today. People used to criticise Alan Ball because he gave the ball away but that was only because he had it so much
-
NORMALLY MY VIEW BUT Reading just have the big centre back and let you play football. Enjoyed the game until we went in front and then instead of going for the kill we started to muck around trying to retain poesission. Thought Gillett was good today
-
looks like i could be on my way home by half time then
-
disagree totally, i would take Baird from Estleigh or Diaper from VT at least they know how football is played in this country. head in the sand if you really think "things just haven't gone for us" or do you believe like some others that the opposition have to roll over and let us win because we try to pass it
-
virtually the same as me , my biggest motivation these days is my elder son who is 20 still wants to go