70's Mike

a hell of a lot going have paid £2 because of the special offer to Tyro/Eastleigh and District sides, it would be interesting to know the split between this offer and the £15 ONE

ARE you Dalek

Your Paragraph sums up , imo, what is wrong with SLH. Some will say that is what happens in a Plc rather than a Private Company but, again imo, we have never been run as a PLC.

Surely Private Companies can have Rights Issues ?

because they bring in experienced players not a couple of teenagers.

problem i have is that a team takes time to gel and if you flog off a couple every year it will never produce a successful first team

I think the role of the Academy needs reviewing by the club. I was staggered when Mick McCARTHY said on Sky that the average age of the Wolves side was only 1 year above our average age. Surely we need to be asking where and how did they achieve this? Is our Academy just a cash cow rather than producing players for this club? Should we be looking to buy in young players with lower league experience like Wolves ( young players with 100 plus games experience)

The AGM like the whole PLC status is a sham , the company is control by 8 to 10 individuals and the rest of the shareholders (me included) have no say in the running of the business especially for as long as wilde is ruperts poodle

we did not have any money noone knows what the current situation is, just out of interest Wolves are the 3rd youngest squad in CCC, I think our academy is being over hyped

And completely ignored by ruperts army

Only Rupert/michael and David Jones know at the moment, and of course the bank. But i expect a significant improvement to be quoted when the half year accounts are submitted early next year as the propaganda machine tells us what a financial miracle Rupert has achieved

HE is also on the board and if he disagreed with any decisions should have resigned

i just believe that when the half year figures are quoted early next year there will be a remarkable improvement with Rupert/Michael using it to justify their actions since May

5000 to tyro league sides

where does it say we HAVE to pay back the overdraft or that we are being pressurised to repay it. reduce it yes but repay it ?

According to your quote from earlier post , we do not need one "Wasn't he quoted recently as saying the footballing side was now on a more sutainable footing? " My question to you what is the other side to the footballing side of the business. Or has Rupert been conning us all along and the financial picture NOW is not as bleak as he is painting it. I for one would not be surprised to see half year results early next year which shows a much better picture which will help Rupert/Michael sing their own praises

What other side is there?

better than being a lion led by a donkey

So are you saying that rupert, as i suspect, has been making the financial position sound worst than it actually is , so that when the half year results are announced early next year he can say look how much i have improved things

did burnley or palace have someone , or just a good british manager who understands how CCC games are won

i see the apathy has even spread to this site with lennon going back above rupert

How? because we scored 2 goal when the other team had gone off on a xmas break, or because we have started drawing at home rather than losing

saddest thing about everything is after 49 years of support , home, away and europe, bring 2 sons into the faith (20 and 14) I AM SLOWLY BUT SURELY REACHING THE POINT WHERE I DO NOT CARE

sky could afford them , rupert knew it was the last year of sky money , good business decision ?

as he did at palace 5 days earlier , the only reason rupert wll not sack him is because it will show what a stupid decision it was to appoint him.