-
Posts
6,835 -
Joined
Everything posted by 70's Mike
-
mine just got his , but at nearly 14 it is a bit babyish for him, so we are giving it as a raffle price at the local boys football club
-
i think we have missed him, but please, lets not build him up for a fall. he was never that good , it is just the rest are awful
-
Another waste of my council tax contribution to Hants Police, they will do all the work and the prosecution service will say no case or it gets to court and the judge throws it out because the evidence is to flimsy
-
They did anyway
-
Reg must be doing cart wheels in his grave.
-
My problem is it does not matter what side i pick from the 20 odd players , i cannot come up with one that will stop us falling to physical pressure
-
reading all this i am glad i am old fashioned when it comes to tickets, just went up to SMS yesterday lunch time to get mine. Although their computer system did try to charge me full price for my teenage sons ticket
-
A lot depends on Uniteds team on the day. Strangely i think we may have a better chance in this game than we do this Sat against Burnley. It is a long time since we were major underdogs in a cup game( except 2003 final)
-
If those 4 things happened it would break out anyway
-
your 3rd sentence sums it up problem is the others he has apparently been holding the ball up for have not been banging in the goals either
-
unless someone gives our defenders and midfield players upper body strength , we can have as many coaches as we like someone like Kugi will still tear us apart
-
are any of them over 6 foot tall
-
It's not self motivation its a lack of self discipline.
70's Mike replied to derry's topic in The Saints
Disagree we DO NOT PLAY GOOD football , because as you say we can't score score and concede goals to about 1 in 20 crosses into our box. Passing the ball around without hurting the opposition is not good football at any level let alone at a professional level -
Been saying the same for weeks, but some are still impressed because we can pass it along the back 4 , i actually feel sorry for the players because last night they were , imo, looking for a tactical change because it was plain to see we were never going to break Palace down playing like that
-
Easy UM WE have always been a private company hiding behind PLC status for the benefit of the few
-
I used to do their Audit back in the 80's before I moved into industry. Knew the Webbs when they were in Rockstone Place, i think Paul was am estimator there then or shortly after they moved to Shirley
-
Reg or John? or am i showing my age
-
Although Golac was a cult hero i have voted for Mick Mills because , imo, Ivan was great going forward but was not a great defender
-
imo banks rarely put companies into administration more likely to be the Inland Revenue,
-
Exactly having a cheap shot at the 13500 who are still putting there hands in their pockets is pathetic. The support goven during games is still brilliant and just because people express a negative opinion on here has no resembalance to the support on match days.
-
How the HELL can we afford plants or do you mean Scooby and Sundance
-
The three main reasons we are not scoring enough goals.
70's Mike replied to derry's topic in The Saints
agree with most of that but would add that the team set up with 2 wide players means that it is difficult for full backs to overlap and get to the byline because the space is occupied by the wide playing forwards, when we do get there we, because of the set up. only have one in the box. -
i want lowe gone BUT if we adopted your attitude in the early 60's we would not have got to a cup semi final as a division 2 club or lead United 2 nil at half time ( we did lose 3-2) in a cup game the next season. Underdogs do sometimes win