JohnnyFartPants

This is the bit that HairDiseaseLeTiss can't grasp. He considers everything in black and white. Crouch is a disaster that happened and is waiting to happen again if given the chance. Lowe, Crouch and Wilde are all below par and not good enough to be running this club, but the one basic fact in all this is that one, perhaps two or maybe one day, all three of them will have to unless someone buys them out. So once you have allowed that to sink into your head, you then have to come to the conclusion that a choice has to be made from a very limited list. For me, it has to be Lowe. It doesn't mean I love him but it does mean I recognise that he has more of an idea than Wilde and Crouch. Everytime Crouch opens his mouth he says something that a dim fan would like to hear. He doesn't always explain how it will be achieved but he does say pretty things.

Do pipe down you knackered old ginger fossil.

No point anyway. He is well past his best.

Silly question but where does the name "Fish" come into Joseph Mills?

How could fans have made it hard for him in any given situation, let alone pre season with no stadium to protest in/around etc?

I see you have gone as far back as suits your agenda, yet again.

You just dont like balance. You take issue with anyone that questions anything that you or another anti-Lowe type spouts off about. Its almost as if you fear a debate as it means you may have to perform more than the average knuckle dragging routine of just saying Lowe eats babies or whatever the next bowl of crap might be. Have a think for one minute about what you just typed. My problem is I seek out negative comments to rebut? Really? You mean like an actual debate? If you just want yes men to back you up and make you feel right all the time and unchallenged when you have a view then might I suggest you start a thread and in the title put a bracketted (Y) for yes in there.

Hang on. You came on here and had a go at me, accusing me of being on the Lowe pay role and then back off saying how Lowe supporters stifle debate. That is exactly what you did by starting all this. An opinion was made, you didnt agree so you played silly games. Dont talk about dictational tendencies when you are one of the least tolerant people when it comes to others opinions.

This week a gobby know all said:

Hmmm.

The biggest joke here is that you actually think I am paid to have a balanced opinion. Wake up matey. I do not defend Lowe, I merely do not mention something negative about him every time I post on here. The reason I don't is a/ because it is boring b/because he isn't the only useless bloke we have had in charge and c/ there are enough muppets on here already doing just that. Yes, I play devils advocate a lot with regard to Lowe as to be perfectly honest he would have been blamed for the Bubonic Plague, AIDS and ASDA's rotten apples by now if people didn't question it. Hey, get your head around this one. It's a forum, for debate. If you want a Love In with all your anti-Lowe mates then why not all meet up somewhere and play mummy and daddies.

May isuggest you go south of the island and pop across on a ferry to Sardinia, docking in Porto De Torres to get a cross over of Italian life from the fair island of Corsica which of course is currently French.

Apology accepted. I still maintain that you did not need to mention that I might be a dishonest person. That was just abusive.

Now you are changing direction. You had a go at me because I suggested it could be open to abuse. You said not everyone has standards like mine, or implied it. Now you wish to substansiate your post by suggesting that checks could take place to ensure fraudulent behaviour could not take place. I think you should pick somewhere to sit, sit down and shut the ***** up.

Calm down deary. All I was saying is that the system would be open to abuse. Considering you do not know me, I would suggest you keep your abuse of my "standards" to yourself, though you have rather just proved my point. Gobby little cretins will always try and get something for nothing. Some will try to get a cheap ticket, others will try and make mischief where there was none. I stand by my original point in that some people (don't get emotional, I don't mean you) will try to abuse the system.

That's your problem, you see. When you say "black pudding" like that, it is so obvious you love Lowe. That is your downfall. I laugh at you for not even realising yourself that you love Lowe by default based on your black pudding opinions.

Not one single penny, AND still you miss the point. It is not about what my own personal opinions are on the current board (who I would love to see leave by the way) but on the same people saying the same things every day. Christ, you even managed to twist a post purely about the predicability of a posters thread to mean that I must be pro-Lowe. You really need some help.

I totally agree with you except the last bit. What did you have for lunch and where will you be taking your holidays?

I could use my address or the girlfriends, both of which have mail diverts on to the house we will soon be living in in Wiltshire.

Go on, give it large!!

I think we have the crux of your next thread should you find it, so why not start before you find it?

Very much open for abuse too. Who doesn't know a good friend with a handy address 50 miles away?

She looked much better on the TV on Saturday.

The funniest thing about her is that she is actually born and educated in Southampton, but moved to Pompey when at college.

He was offered the job at AC Milan but he said that people would always assume he had it easy and anyone could have acheived success there. He is a grafter and will one day rule the world.