verlaine1979

The fact that his greatest achievement in management was 16 years ago is a bit of a worry, but I suppose he's no more or less likely to fail than Koeman was when we appointed him. Doesn't have the benefit of RK's reputation as a player, but perhaps has a slightly better managerial record overall. RK wasn't an appointment to make other clubs envious two years ago, and neither is Claude Puel now, but that's just where we are as a club.

Is Ronald the first moderately successful European journeyman manager to do well in the Premier League? Garde, Magath and a few others have been spectacular failures in the recent past, while I suppose you could say Flores did a decent job last season after moving around Spain a bit. I must admit, Puel does have a bit of a whiff about him, but it's probably just because he sounds like someone Fulham would have hired ten years ago.

I'd love to know how you think a handful of Saints fans opining on whether Rudi Garcia has a viable Plan B is going to help the board to strike centi-million dollar sponsorship deals...

At 31 years old, and with a grand total of 14 goals in his 248 Premier League appearances to date (about 1 every 18 games), I think it's unlikely he's going to suddenly find a rich vein of attacking form.

Exactly. Always said he was a decent option for his industry, but with his goals and assists record, I doubt we were fending off a host of rivals for his signature.

Perhaps it has to do with the impending availability of the Sevilla job. The only advantage the Saints job has over that one is money - in terms of club prestige & quality of life, you'd go with Seville every time. Maybe the named managers are waiting to see who gets that one first.

Shame about Garcia, but on reflection, not surprising that he'd turn his nose up at the prospect of swapping the Eternal City for Ocean Village.

Checked in with a friend in Paris whose football hipster credentials are impeccable. Rates both Garcia and Puel, but prefers the latter, saying he has a knack for improving players.

Ryan Giggs always comes across in interviews as mouth-breathingly stupid, which might have been acceptable in a manager fifty years ago but isn't any more. I'd be incredibly surprised if he ever amounts to anything as a manager now that the intellectual demands of management have risen beyond inspiring a bunch of twenty-somethings to address you as 'gaffer'.

We've finished in the top 6 once since returning to the Premier League, and most of our progress has been made in spite of the received wisdom that in England we play a special version of football inexplicable to outsiders. To be honest, none of the options mooted so far look unassailably great, but if it's a choice between sticking with the philosophy the club have pursued up until now, or reverting to the Premier League mean by hiring an 'established' dinosaur like Moyes, Bruce or any of the others that might be available, then I hope they continue to break with the norm.

Err, wasn't last summer immediately after Barcelona won the treble in Enrique's first season? And considering Saints was the first time the two Koemans had worked together in management, it would seem a bit odd to let late-developing sentiment keep RK from the job is allegedly desires so much. All in all, sounds like absolute toss.

I'm pretty sure Tuchel said he wasn't interested 2 years ago when he was out of a job after leaving Mainz. I doubt his year at Dortmund has made him any more interested in mid-table Premier League jobs.

Didn't he win the league with a pretty unfancied Bordeaux team before he took over the french national job?

I presume it's taking a while as Everton didn't immediately agree to our opening demand for compensation and we're now well into the tedious haggling phase (faxes are probably involved). I wouldn't read anything more conspiratorial into it than that.

True, though having won three European competitions in three years, Emery is probably a little closer to proving himself worthy of a shot at a big job than RK. Perhaps RK would have been in with a shout of the Barcelona job if he'd stayed at Saints and just kept on putting in highly creditable performances, but I'd argue that's more because Barca seem to be the only major club who appoint managers based on sentiment/affinity for the club rather than a prior history of achievement. If you take Barcelona out of the equation, you wouldn't say RK's record as a manager with us put him within a million miles of managing Madrid, Bayern or any other top tier club.

Maybe the money will tempt him, but I can't see us or any other mid-table PL team being a wise move for Emery. He's already at a club of similar size/stature to any of the ones he's been linked with (us, Everton, West Ham) and it's hard to see how starting over and achieving a similar level of success with a club in England would put him any closer to a job with one of the big names of Europe. If he wants a big club and none are available this summer, he'd be crazy not to stick with Sevilla for another year, where he already knows the set up and maintaining his already impressive level of achievement will be much easier. He might miss out on an extra £1m this year, but in terms of maximising his odds of getting a massive job with an even bigger salary in future, it would be the more sensible wager.

Their record signing cost them £28m, so it would be hard to argue that they aren't already operating (occasionally) at a much higher level in the transfer market than us. How many years before we spend close to £30m on a transfer?

Didn't they change the FFP rules last year to 'encourage investment'? Think owners (particularly new ones) are allowed to pump money in for first 3-5 years now as long as they can show plans to eventually become self-sustaining through revenue growth.

Of course, like I said, I'm not disputing that he's loaded. I'm just saying that you have to be substantially richer than RK or pretty much any other footballer before doubling your income makes no meaningful difference to your quality of life.

In an ideal world perhaps, but not a chance. After winning three successive Europa Leagues you don't come to a mid-table premier league club for the pay cheque. You go to a big-but-not-Barca/Real/Man U/Bayern CL club for the pay cheque!

Where are people getting the idea that he's already rich enough that money doesn't mean anything to him? I'm sure he's got a couple of million in the bank, which makes him approximately as wealthy has half the right-to-buy lottery winners who acquired houses in zones 1&2 during the late 80s... There's a long way to go between there and genuine f*** you money.

If he does go, it'll be because he's been told that the (seemingly reasonable) £50-60m before reinvestment you propose is more like the £10-20m of previous summers. And while £100m doesn't guarantee anything if you waste it, if you spend it well like Sevilla, Dortmund etc, there's no reason why that outlay (assuming the figure isn't inflated to include salary outlay etc) couldn't make you at least competitive for the last CL place.

Surely it's more likely the case that we've just given him a massive pay raise in return for increasing his release clause to something that would make all but the very top clubs think twice?

Agree, Forster absolutely hesitated because Kane was moving towards the ball. If you have to stop/change direction in order during a passage of play, you're surely already 'active'?

Maybe the fact that his passing was largely woeful, and that with pretty much freedom of the Villa half, he didn't really make a penetrating run into the box until about the 80th minute? Still, he always looks like he's taking the game seriously and he's got a nice salt-of-the-earth nickname, so he must be good, right?