aintforever

Johnson had a mare there

Yes, but as such a scheme doesn't currently exist in the rest of the UK there are currently about 3.5million people without the relevant ID. I'm not against voter ID, I genuinely don't give a monkeys either way. I'm just trying to explain to you the rather obvious reasons Labour have been opposed to it. Even if that scheme is free and easily available it is still another hoop for people to jump through and may result in less of Labour's demographic voting.

Again, it appears you have a problem reading. "Research by the Electoral Commission, the independent body that sets the standards of elections in the UK, indicated in 2015 about 3.5 million citizens or 7.5% of the electorate did not have access to any approved photo ID. There are variations across different groups - for example, women are considerably less likely than men, and black people considerably less likely than white people, to have a driving licence. Certain ethnic groups such as Gypsies and Irish Travellers are much less likely than the average to have a passport."

What exactly are Saints waiting for? ****ing shambles of a club.

The research was by the Electoral Commission you dopey old fool. Try ****ing reading.

Your talking out of your arse as usual. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50044539

Because certain groups of people are more likely to be disenfranchised and these are more likely to vote Labour (Young, poor and ethnic minorities). At least that’s what some guy in radio 5 was saying studies have shown.

Yeah, I'm sure it's only one side that commits fraud.

Bonkers. He will be at Man Utd in weeks.

Especially as it was mentioned in the context of climate change, and Corbyn is right, poorer countries are going to suffer much more.

It’s ****ing embarrassing that these two are the best our country can come up with.

Can’t believe our choice is between either of these c*nts

There is little point in an Economic Impact Assessment because expert opinions are apparently not important. Plus we have to plough on regardless of the consequences anyway - otherwise democracy dies or something.

He lived on the 8th floor and the fire started on the 4th so I'm not sure it's that relevant.

If you’re concerned about lying politicians you can’t do much better than this beauty:

You just perfectly illustrated his reasons for lying. Standing up for the Palestinian cause is nothing to do with being anti Jewish.

He lied in the interview, I would have thought that was obvious.

It’s not strange, he just didn’t want the interviewer to know his views on zionism.

Probably because it’s best to avoid the whole Israeli hornets nest if you are a politician. Try to stand up for Palestinians and Israelis try to twist it into being anti-semitism.

You can be against Zionism and not hate Jews.

pranksters

This election is like a depressing return to the 80s - a choice between a bunch of utter c*nts who sow misery and division and a load of fools who want to make everything free and ruin the economy. I can't forsee any good outcome, I guess the least worst possible would be a hung parliament and some sort of coalition.

Wupert obviously wasn’t very confident of attracting many Labour voters then

Lol. Their paper is 6 years old, I think it’s fair to say if their theory was correct they would have a Nobel prize by now given that if true they would save the world’s government’s billions. There is not one country on this planet that wouldn’t want their theory to be true because climate change is an expensive inconvenience to everyone regardless of politics. Like me you are obviously not a scientist, why are you so eager to believe these obvious crack-pots over the many reputable scientific bodies, NASA etc?

Must be something seriously wrong at the club with so many jumping ship. Is there actually anyone with any football nouse left above Ralph?