sotonjoe

Did they all tune in to hear him on talksport as well? Otherwise, they're very naughty boys.

Bloody hell , careful my lad. Those'll be taken as heathen words round here if you're not careful!

I suggested that people might want to remind themselves of the events of these meetings to remember that all involved made themselves look like children (o members of tsw) with their petty squabblings, when they should have been doing their best to present a united front amidst very difficult circumstances. The onus isn't on me to prove that. The accusations of being disrespectful by not being interested in what Lawrie has to say were made at me and not by me. The accusers should be proving why my lack of interest makes that bad and to do this they need to show that Lawrie played no part at all in our downfall. And let's be very clear, that needs to be NO PART AT ALL, since I'm not saying he was the main protagonist. I'm saying there were a bunch of people with differing levels of responsibility from whom I don't want hear about what is and isn't good for sfc ever again. And FWIW, I have just wasted five minutes of my life and found this first had account of the goings on at one of our agms ... So he was there, squabbling (shouting if stentorious is anything to go by) with the rest of them, declaring we would get relegated with Poortvleit in charge when the poor bloody guy was sat there in the room with them. As I said, playing a supporting role in the cast of characters who made us look a laughing stock. And that, once more, is why I have no interest in listening to what he has to say about our owner or manager ... I want a clean, clean break.

I wouldn't waste my time! All of us on here know what went on. Sill, playground-esque squabbles about about pictures of trains and the like. What a silly line to try and take this discussion on anyway .... " if you haven't got recordings edited with lawrie's exact words clearly audible then I'm sure he didn't play any part in any of the agreements". If you really think that Lawrie played NO PART in the boardroom squabbles then you are mad. Still, this isn't supposed to be another one of THOSE threads. This is about whether not wanting to hear Lawrie on the radio makes somebody a bad person.

are you on the beers already as that certainly doesn't make any sense to me!

exactly ... i'm sure he couldn't care less ... and he certainly wouldn't be chirping "do the respect of listening to me, I achieved great things ofr this club between 1973 and 1985". See .. I even know the dates without looking them up. Bet some of the moral crusaders championing him don't even know that much info!

How on earth is that venemous? It seems pretty matter of fact to me. As for baseless .. .you best dig out those old radio solent recordings of the agms if you don't remember all the embarrassing squabbling that went on between the lot of them. You are very, very easily shocked, if criticims of this level appalls you that's for sure. And so very big with your ignore button as well. That's like putting your fingers in your ears and saying lalala when somebody says something you don't like. good luck out there in that big bad world ... you're gonna do great!

who is co? super lawrie and captain crouch?

That's beautiful. Does that mean I'm hyper bad for not wanting to listen to him on the radio?

where's the venom?

By not turning on the radio, does that mean I'm not showing respect for our fa cup win? What a ludicrous idea.

Whose denying him an opinion? I'm just not interested in listening to it! Do you think he'd be personally very hurt by that?

Maybe I will eh? I'm gonna segue my John Hartson one into a 'cmon the army lads' one and a 'we love lawrie' one. Just to make sure everyone is happy!

must admit to chuckling at though. must have a lot of spare time, being unemployed and that

champions league and we're having a laugh etc

is it worth a chant on sat to show our sympathy?

link

i predict we'll play 46 games, win some lose some and perhaps even draw some. I think we'll draw more than we win or lose.

Sounds like they're asking for a song to me ;-)

a good bit of perspective there!

... so we can rip your suggestions to shreds. ahahahahahahahahahahahha:tfrag:

you thought he'd walk out on mk dons or you thought we'd sack wotte and appoint ince whilst we were still in administration and without an owner?

he didn't

If we could dig up something of a military past for Hartson, could we give him a chant or two then? ;-)

Do we know how ITK MLT was now about the Pinnacle farce? Do we suspect he was sweet talked by Lynam or that he knew the truth about the financial backing or lack of? Have we brushed our anti- Pinnacle feelings under the carpet just because Lynam comes on here now and again to sweet talk us?