um pahars

We may not even make the terraces and be consigned to "The Bank" at Bemerton and a numb er of other paving slabbed standing areas in the Wessex League!!!!!

20 Forest 50 pts 21 Barneley 49 pts 22 Saints 48 pts 23 Norwich 47 pts 24 Charlton 36pts And that's with 2 home wins, a loss at Sheff Weds and drawing with Forest (so a win there and we could be safe, but that would mean 3 wins out of 4!!!!!)

Problem is that it is always a struggle to discuss things with people with multiple personalities, particularly when they're on a wind up. Now if you would be so kind as to keep one persona for at least, say 24 hours, then we might at least have a chance. If not, then how about that tagline letting us know which personality is posting each time. HTH

Do yourself a favour and content yourself wth the pathetic notion of my enemies enemy etc etc etc as it just about sums you up.

I don't normally go in for the abuse, but when he starts dishing it out then it's very easy to get drawn in to a slanging match. Sadly, he has some good things to say, but at the same time it's very dangerous just to use the internet as your source of information and then pretend you know what you're on about. Rule 34 has fck all to do with supporter ownership, influence or control (and I'm sure David Conn would put him right on that as well).

Where have you been lately?????

You've been banned numerous times before, so tell us why that was then:cool: But you did that when you were posting under your Sundance handle (which you were banned under:smt119:rolleyes:), so please forgive us if we struggle to keep up with your multiple ID's and personas;)

You need to go and read Rule 34 and really understand what it was all about then dinlo man, as it is about the restrictions on dividends, directors salaries etc etc etc The ethos was to preserve sporting and cultural aspects of football and prevent over commercialisation, but it had absolutely fck all to do with supporter ownership or influence of Club's by its supporters. Most clubs were and still are owned by shareholders and in fact in the "olden days" the share ownership and control was even more restricted. Historically most football clubs incorporated as limited companies (with a restirction on the sale and control of shares, ownership and control of the clubs). You only have to look at our own club who were probably an ideal exampe of how "old clubs" were set up and run. A few gentlemen shareholders doing their public service, but absolutley fck all supporter influence.

And tonight we have the polite Nineteen Canteen Mk VI. I wonder how many of your other guises will make an appearance tonight??? I'm going for Flashman Mk II. The Bear (original version), the odd Sundance Mk II & Mk III, ending with Nineteen Mk I.

Not the best of threads to be dredging up in this time of togetherness and unity (that's not to say I didn't have a giggle at some of the posts back then!!!).

Why it's the fans of course, as we certainly haven't been able to replicate the banana waving solidarity of the Kippax.

Should have taken whatever Swansea were offering in order to avoid administration.

What are you going on about????? Why is it a consequence of Rule 34 being circumvented????? Even prior to Rule 34 being circumvented it was shareholders who still controlled the decisions of the vast majority of football clubs.

Thanks for highlighting nickh's ignorance LOL. How the fck can you even think that that poll, with that question, in that context equates to people campaigning for administration I'll never know LMFAO.:smt119:rolleyes:

Actually we hadmore, we had: Strachan Wigley Sturrock Wigley Redknapp Wise/Bassett Burley Dodd/Gorman Pearson JP Wotte

Beacause this is the noddy, anonymous, ether world of the internet where clicking on a poll does not equate to campaigning (unless you're a total dinlo of course). Well if you don't know if they were campaigning then WTF are you inferring they were for then???.:smt119:smt119 So let's keep ths simple and get back to the point in context. Please feel free to furnish this forum with evidence that many on this board have been campaigning for administration. So far we have Stanley, Alpine, Richmond (and even then they're only posting their views up on here) or did I miss the five man march for administration???

So we were good during the Wigley era then :smt119:rolleyes::smt119 Get in bed with nickh, you make a great pair of rewriting history.

And so therefore they are campaigning for it. Fck me sometimes I wonder just how your logic works:rolleyes::smt119:rolleyes::smt119:rolleyes:

I would hardly equate voting on a poll on here, following a demorailising defeat, with relegation and administration staring you in the face, and the mood being, "let's get it over and done with" with campaigning for administration for a long time. There's probably been a handful of people campaigning for administration - Alpine, Stanley, ???, ???, ???

I'm just saying that the qualities you highlighted earlier have little bearing on what makes a good coach. That's all. Killer was a class centre half, great servant to the club and an all round saints legend.

I'm sure he could organise himself at a corner, but does this automatically translate into being able to pass it on and coach others to do the same? Gazza was a right little maestro in the middle of the park ......... Bobby Moore was a sensational centre half ........... Mark Dennis was a tenascious full back ........... etc etc etc

One can only assume that you must have missed this littel ditty (I'll highlight it this time around). So the, "Football Club Suffers Fall In Attendances Due To Poor Performances And Results", headline comes as a bit of a shock to you then???? And as for your retort in blue, then you might as well have simply said, "it would have been better had crowds still been the same as when we were in the Premiership and everyone also donated another £20 each game" as that would be just as irrelevant and as much of a fantasy.

What are/were his coaching attributes?

Indeed he is, but you need to be really on his pet hate list to make it int his note pad. When I speak about elastivity of demand, I'm not just referring to price elasticity, but also a simple recognition that at a static price you have to give people a reason to come. Wins, goals, entertainment, a sense of belonging, a sense of belief, engender a community spirit etc etc etc. Without delivering any of that it is simply not right to start blaming the customers for failing to buy the product.

Indeed, 2nd bottom on last 8 games: http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/D1/oform.html and still 2nd bottom on last 6 games: http://www.4thegame.com/statistics/championship/tables/currentform.html To be second bottom in current form at this stage isn't the best of news when you're fighting for your life.