um pahars
Members-
Posts
6,501 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by um pahars
-
CONFIRMED - Virgil Van Dijk joins on Five Year Deal
um pahars replied to Brizzie Saints's topic in The Saints
I was told it was a done deal on Saturday evening. In reply to Batman, also heard no more transfers in, but working on a loan from a "big " club. Also told Mane & Vic are Koeman's line in the sand & he has told those above not sell and he is happy to manage the situation with both. -
I'm normally a fairly laid back kind of fella, but have to say the timing and attitude here ******* stinks. He's undermined the start of the season, but more annoying he undermined our first European campaign in a decade. Not saying he is wholly responsible for last Thursday's debacle, but must have been hard preparing for the game with this kind of whining going on. Th Cub needs to stand firm & then he needs to come back with some serious arris licking & decent performances.
-
That might be something to do with a Sky (Spurs supporting) journalist putting stuff all over Twitter and embellishing the story. Think he's had his knuckles rapped!'!!!!
-
Crab Lungs sorted me out with a kitchen a couple of years back and it was one of the best decisions we made when we rebuilt this ole house.
-
If a player is transferred without putting in a transfer request then technically the selling club have to pay up the balance of the contract (his entire salary due inc any loyalty bonuses). Now of course this figure will be negotiated to a settlement that both the player and the selling club are happy with, but in this instance with Stones having 4 years left on his contract (I think), then it is a substantial figure that Everton will not have to net off the money received from Chelsea. Will be interesting to see if Everton & West Brom stand firm. I'd wager West Brom will let him go, but Everton will stand firm and hold him to his contract??????!!
-
never fails to make me chuckle l!
-
Disappointed??????? f@¥k off!!!!!! Just had the best away day of my 40 years following Saints and that's after 5 cracking years. Disappointed is the wrong word even allowing for setbacks and problems thrown our way.
-
The Club have to be flexible and consider the context of each game. It should be obvious that a trip to Holland will mean more travelling independently and less requiring official travel. Plus delaying the announcement of the official travel and price being quite steep means the demand was not going to be that high. With people starting to travel on Wednesday, let's hope it's not too long before they make tickets available without having to do the official tour. (I had one mate who was even considering buying the coach deal just to get the ticket and then fly, but apparently you only get the ticket during the journey!!!!)
-
In their defence, they probably struggled to put these packages together with such short notice, BUT BUT BUT they shouldn't be holding these tickets back now and restricting them to those travelling with them. There are people who meet the eligibility criteria who want to travel independently who would bite their arms off for these tickets. If if they remain unsold, then it would be an absolute travesty.
-
Think it's only natural that people are disappointed, despondent and/or feel aggrieved. There have always been these type of issues in the game, its just that I think in the modern era of mega wonga, player power, agents influence, playersmercenary nature etc, then these occasions appear more frequent and more high profile. I also imagine most of us are aware of our place in the pecking order and to have 80 or so League Clubs below is a privileged position to be in (particularly given our recent past). Doesn't mean we won't have a moan bout it though. As for the Spurs fans giving it the big one about pecking order, status & bsigningcentre backs, then one word should remind them that it's all swings and roundabouts. SOL CAMPBELL
-
No one has mentioned us in a bidding war with Spurs, so am presuming when Toby's team made it clear they wanted Spurs, then negotiations took off to find a deal that could be taken forward. Understand AM played hardball until they got the figure they were happy with. I know Saints were more than happy to pay the agreed sum in the loan deal, but they also had a range in mind if AM pulled the loan figure (and the Spurs number is in That range).
-
Two things I would add would be that Spurs had to up their bid a few times before it was accepted and Toby & agent (dad/brother) were keeping their powder dry with us in case his first choice (Spurs) collapsed.
-
The view is that AM only ever saw it as a timing issue, in that once they agreed to sell and knew he had a couple of suitors, they would pay it once they received the monies from Spurs. Toby kept his options open all the way through, sensible, or stringing us along, I'll let you decide (although the inside line is people feel very let down by his actions).
-
Spurs (and others) have been on the case for months through intermediaries and back channels. Similarly Saints have been crystal clear of their desire to sign him and what they were going to pay him (joint top earner at the Club). They were also prepared to match any rival with regards the fee up to a certain figure (the £11.5m quoted is well within this). Toby knew we wanted him and what the deal was, but he also knew of the other offers. Saints were also aware of other suitors but had no mechanism to get him signed up early under a "pre deal", and started getting nervous when the players co agent?? (Dad or brother???) began stalling. It was then quite clear that he wanted to sign for Spurs and the only hand we had to play was a legal threat, which they are still pursuing, but only in the anticipation of compensation, not of voiding the deal. Toby is on much more at Spurs and there are other financial inducements. He and his team have driven this and ignored all attempts by us to tie him down, once he was first tapped up a fair few months ago he was off.
