bridge too far

How can 'future earnings' be considered as part of the CVA? Any supplier to the club could argue that same point if that were the case

oil

labour

gestation

situ

Perhaps not wise to get a second-hand helmet TBH. They're a bit like motor bike helmets, any damage to the inner core could cause problems.

^^ Coider

pitchforks

shaker

season

No doubt they'll have balls of steel now they have a new paymeister, eh?

masters

dodges

Bu$$er! It's the one day I don't have access to the interweb

Would it not make sense for HMRC to challenge the FCR rule first? Then they'll know how to proceed from there, surely. If they 'win' then the whole CVA will have to be rewritten. If they 'lose', they can then raise the question about irregularities with the existing CVA. I'm sure they'll raise all three issues but they have to start somewhere.

More likely to be this Ashok Patel IMO http://www.balsara.co.uk/?q=node/4

He's just a double D i c k!

arrows

Excellent film - but I'd blubbed already as I'd read the book before I saw the film.

ET Shawshank Redemption Philadelphia

Indeed - they should be left with a Nanny

shoes (you guys won't get that link )

Mr Justice Mann seems to come down quite heavily on the Insolvency Practitioner business too: http://www.bllaw.co.uk/pdf.aspx?page=14487

blind

lane