Sir Ralph
Subscribed Users-
Posts
2,060 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Sir Ralph
-
It’s in the brackets - providing only temporary asylum in many instances and prioritising the relocation of people to safe parts of their own country rather than coming here. Rwanda is a good example. It’s possible if the incentives for those countries is in place and the legislation reducers the risk of challenge. No - they want to come here no be shipped out to another less preferrable location for processing. Im glad Italy has put the cat amongst the pigeons as it might start forcing the eu to take this even more seriously. Needs some good conservative governance from the relevant eu countries to force their hand harder
-
How about for starters reducing the scope of what is considered a refugee (including refugeee status being temporary and identitying safe areas in their own countries which means they should seek asylum in other countries) and allowing processing in offshore locations.
-
https://www.reuters.com/world/italy-suspends-eu-schengen-free-travel-pact-with-spain-over-ceuta-crisis-2026-07-31/ well done Italy
-
Exactly but as there haven’t been any changes we have heard of being passed in terms of changes to legal frameworks we can assume that it hasn’t been successful in changing the legal framework, even if it was trying. Thats why it’s reasonable to criticise the EU for not having used it’s influence to improve agreement / change legislation on returns rather than just changing its own internal rules (which are uncertain still as they rely on third countries cooperating, which they may not do). Get personal - it doesn’t bother me - I have my own view of you but it’s not productive sharing it and it doesn’t make me feel “big”.
-
So nothing we are aware of. My point being the EU as an organisation should be doing more to disincentivise illegal immgration through changes to the international legal framework. It seems that the EU isn’t taking this issue as seriously as it should and this is a failure on its part
-
My question is what has the eu done as a bloc to try to influence international law on this matter? happy to accept that the Dublin mechanism was one factor in helping to minimise migration.
-
.
-
You don’t take political nuances from other sides at all. You are consistently on the side of increasing taxes and government intervention in society. That is somebody who is who has views to the left. Stop claiming you are a balanced “centrist”. Also in your post you have said I dismiss your posts by saying you are left and then done the same about me! In answer to your question about the Dublin agreement I don’t think it was a very successful process (apparently only 260 people were returned under it). My question is what has the eu done as a bloc to try to influence international law on this matter? This is a serious issue for eu members so I would have expected a lot of activity and trying to apply influence on this front….
-
Great. This suggests that the usual characters that regularly agree with you are probably on the same political spectrum. We are getting somewhere…
-
It does impact us. Pretty much every illegal migrant in the uk has come through Europe so seems a pretty legitimate point to me, if you’re concerned about illegal immigration
-
Just an observation- those on the right on this forum admit they are. Nobody has admitted to be on the left. On the balance of probability there has to be some on here. Maybe that is as a result of a perception that their views are actually centrists, even though they aren’t really.
-
Genuine question - what measures has the EU put in place to disincentivise illegal immigration. I assume EU countries have to abide by their laws so what has the EU done, including trying to influence international law?
-
And this attitude is why we have the problem
-
Oh I’m sure I have similar political opinions to them - I’ll admit it. I have no problem admitting my position on the political spectrum. Others do
-
Wow I didn’t realise you were so big time😂. I’m not going to get into a cock off with you as I don’t need to. You and your buddies (3 or 4 of them) have hijacked this forum, all support one another and convinced each other that you are centrists. It would be mildly amusing if it wasn’t so sad.
-
It’s a weird lefty echo chamber on here. A small group of “centrists” spend each and every day commenting which also suggests they should probably focus on work more rather than complaining other people that do work hard aren’t paying enough tax.
-
The centrists are off again. Being so reasonable and middle of the road.🤣 This issue in Spain is going to strengthen farage and badenochs hand.
-
And have a WC with no European teams - could luck with the revenue generation on that. Your investors will all of a sudden be less keen
-
This is the end of Gianni. He can’t survive this. Thought he had it all under control but that’s was arrogance does. He didn’t engage other confederations and proposed a controversial idea without telling them. Did he expect they would just whimper in the corner and accept it?
-
Never given a proper chance with us and we didnt play to his strengths.
-
Or maybe to let the fans know the main man is at the heart of things, with the players, if it goes wrong.
-
The FA / EFL have lost the plot over this and I think will go completely over the top - I reckon a significant ban will be imposed (ie 6 months or more). They seem to want to really really make a point about this. I can’t see them punishing the club so hard and letting Tonda off. What will be very unreasonable, if they do that, is how late they have left the decision. Not only kicking us out of the play off but messing up our prep for this season too, when they should have acted quicker. Fingers crossed
-
I honestly think they are going to give Tonda a lengthy ban even though they have taken too long to charge him and left us in no position to get a replacement before the season starts. They have acted like jumped up bureaucrats over the entire spygate matter and the whole issue seems to have gone to their heads
-
I read before the WC that infantino only cares about Asian and African confederation votes (which is why he gives them lots of funding) as that’s enough to see him reelected. This will generate more money for those smaller confederations which is why the motion will get through because of their votes. Looks like uefa are now going to tell their fas to threaten boycott which is the right thing to do. Could be the end of old egg head. I think they should threaten boycott for removal of the proposal and that infantino must also step down. The WC doesn’t exist without the European nations and the WC is fifas prized asset - it can’t afford a boycott and neither can the smaller confederations. Go hard
-
The WC is nothing without European teams people won’t watch a cup with Brazil, dirty argies with no Messi and Morocco.
