Colinjb

Yes, we would be better off if Liverpool won. But, frankly, f**k those rancid up-themselves, entitled, self pitying ******s and their f**king club.

This one per chance? https://www.ebay.com/itm/Southampton-Under-Armour-2018-19-Third-Replica-Jersey-Red/302747095122?hash=item467d221052:g:hQsAAOSwzbVbBLlv It's still very much there.

Assuming McCarthy goes to Liverpool. (Ha!!!!!) Butland Promes Johnny Evans Alfie Mawson Aritz Elustondo

The late, late goal went in. And precisely no f**ks were given.

Has to be the Boufal goal. And Alex McCarthy player of the season.

Is that real?

In the context of all results today, 1-1 is a positive. We are out of the bottom 3, win at Swansea and we are basically there. But for f**ks sake.

Yep. Later ended up at Wolves. I would submit an 'honourable' mention for Andreas Jakobsson too.

Celtic must truly hate us.

It would be very sad to see Maya go. Really hope he doesn't move.

With that strategy, he will fit right in at Sunderland.

Is their infrastructure now enough to sustain them?

So, people were murdered because some little oik wasn't getting any? Just, what!?

Never go back. Although the heart strings are saying it would be fun.

Graham Poll on BT Sport insisted that any contact with the keeper in the air is a foul. So it should have been dissallowed based on the rules of the game. Charlie didn't do anything wrong though, just stood there. I simply cannot understand how it was a foul, unless football has suddenly become a non-contact sport.

Glad we are continuing to try and go forward (At least after Tadic and Redmond came on.) Makes the inevitable defeats slightly less tedious.

It's not going to happen.

Absolutely not enough. Stick a fork in us, we're done.

Slightly confused....

Twenty minutes to make a positive difference.... No, I'm not holding my breath.

The only thing that I will miss is the mediaexposure. The ease in finding match coverage, highlights and reports on how we aredoing.

We bought our own?

Not sure how many people will have seen, but there has been someoutcry over the BBC's decision to broadcast Ian McDiarmid's reading the infamous'Rivers of Blood' speech originally given by Enoch Powell in the 60's. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43745447 I have been having a quite interesting debate with another forum member over the questions itraises over free speech. Whether controversial items like this should becensored. On what grounds should they be censored, etc My perspective is that censoring ideas like this is not right, only risks driving repellent ideas underground and will prove to be detrimental to society as it lacks that chance to learn from such material. The alternative view was that without having the right level of educational standing or intellectual capability these ideas will only prove dangerous and will be misused. While I have strength in my conviction, I can understand the opposing view. It's not an easy topic.... Which is why it should be discussed. Has the BBC gone too far? Should these ideas be kept out of the mainstream ordo they need to be kept in the open to be debunked?

Extremely interesting. From memory he was regarded as something of a joke figure here (due to manager's comments?) A great shame he never fulfilled his potential. Physical resilience and health can so often be a lottery.

Actually enjoyed the game today. But of course: Plucky defeat.