Fan The Flames

More clueless pub bore nonsense. I never said that the wronged PO people were part of the conspiracy. I said that GB News, The Mail and all the stuff on your FB timeline is, because they are only pointing the finger at Ed Davey and Blair. Sure Davey didn't cover himself in glory but he's way down the food chain and your concentration on him is odd, it only shows that here's yet another issue you haven't properly got to grips with. You care so much about Mr Bates you don't even know his first name. Ed Davey fobbed off Alan Bates, I wonder who was the first minister to eventually meet with him? And the women standing against Davey wasn't even a wronged sub post mistress, she couldn't find one who wanted to do it.

Similarly culpable is your clue.

It is a right wing conspiracy if when seeking sanctions against a Lib-Dem minister in the role for two years you completly ignore similarly culpable tory ministers.

"Then-chief executive Paula Vennells congratulated Mark Davies and his PR team on their "extensive work"." She really is a nasty corporate lackey.

If DT did nothing wrong why is he seeking immunity.

GB News in trouble again https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-67943541

That's too simplistic and you know what they say about simplistic ideas.

Fuckin Sir Rowland Hill and Charles Babbage are up to their necks in this mess.

All that shows is who agreed to going with Fujitsu. There are hundreds of decisions between that moment and 700 people being wrongly convicted.

The point of my post wasn't a critique of your content, it was an observation that you haven't got any tory content because you just regurgitate the shit from your anti-labour timeline. You don't know the tories involved because The Mail or Andrew Tate hasn't told you. And the fact you couldn't work work out my post shows what a dull muppet you are. I haven't mentioned any politicians at fault in the thread, like Egg I think they aren't the major actors in all of this. It's you and your muppet mates scrabbling around trying to pin it on Blair and Starmer, it's pathetic.

You're all Blair, Blair, Blair, Davey, Davey, Davey. Then you don't know who was responsible when the Tories were in power. You don't know because that info is not included in the shit you're spuing from your timeline. What a joker.

No they are not. There are people who bear the most responsibility, some of it criminal, and there are some following corporate/government orders and some minor part players. This notion that they are all to blame is the same as the 'they are all at it' bollocks that the tories float out through their media mates, when they are trying to obfuscate for their latest indiscretion. Don't fall for it WSS, you're better than that.

So we have this disgraceful scandal and the double knock of the despicably slow response by the authorities and the muppets are scrabbling around trying to find a way to pin it on Kier Starmer.

Fraser, why on a Southampton site, in an article about Southampton, with nothing to do with Swansea, would you call Russell Martin the ex-Swansea City manager. It reads a bit odd, that's all.

Disgrace how the high flyers in the PO have not be held to account Petition if you are interested https://chng.it/N4L6CHMG

Do people identify as people, don't we identify by country, region, gender, social tribe etc etc I worked for a Jehovah's Witnesses company for a while, they certainly Identified as JWs first. Talking how fucked the region is, that a memorial service for an Iranian military officer would attract hundreds of members of the public.

Thank you

I don't know, but I would guess the people over there see themselves as Jews and Muslims.

Shocking

VAR and refs are different things, VAR is run by refs, they are all part of the same system. If you impose a time limit then you have to defer to the onfield decision if nothing conclusive is found in time. So the ref has to make a decision that the system can defer to, I'm not saying it's better if left to the ref, I'm saying time limits requires it. Currently refs can allow the game to continue knowing that VAR will sort it out. For instance the West Ham v Arsenal 'was the ball in or out' goal, currently in that situation the ref can think that was possibly out, but allow the move to finish knowing that VAR will sort it out. With time limits they shouldn't do that. There are difficulties with every approach, but having the game stop for three to four minutes for VAR to re-ref it is not in anyones best interest. We haven't got a good bunch of refs at the moment and we have a reffing system that sees the rules as the centre of the sport rather than the football. They are too defensive and lack transparency or accountability in my opinion.

VAR could be improved if we didn't have these fundamentalists running the show. Time limits are the way forward, for it to work refs have to make decisions again instead of leaving it for VAR to sort out. During VAR breaks, we have to stop pundits and commentators saying 'well the important thing is that they get the decision right', noooo this has become the new 'well he was entitled to go down'. The important thing is to improve the game, long tedious video watching is shit.

Because the useless bunch of refs we have, will be sin binning players from small clubs and backing away smiling from advancing screaming players from the big clubs.

And they have the same weather in August as they had today

True, a slicker, nastier Trump like could easily emerge.

You two need to start reading posts a bit more. I never said he will be a dictator or that Trump will change the constitution, I said the doomsday stuff is far fetched. I said the notion of changing the term limits will be talked about, by political commentors and supporters, just like it was under previous presidents.