trousers

Perhaps Pompey will be looking to upgrade their manager when they go up to Division 3 next season....

Aye, it wasn't one of his best, was it? Bit disappointing given his recent run of excellent form. Hope this is a temporary dip rather than an indication of things to come. P.s. good news that Lander are out of the picture. Had bad vibes about their credentials. We're not Pompey, who are prepared to accept a bid from any Tom, D i c k or Goofy...

You won't get an answer to that question

Given he had no desire to extend his contract, this would have been Koeman's last season with us. We'll never know whether he would have gone out with a bang or with a whimper, ergo I've no idea where we would have finished in comparison to Puel.

Agree, although he lost Aguero for their 3rd

Looked to me like Puel got a message (not sure from where) that Long couldn't continue, but it turned out Long wasn't as injured as they thought and Long ended up going down the tunnel in a bit of a huff with Puel shaking his head in disbelief.

The tactics (to frustrate City) worked in the first half. Who's to say they wouldn't have worked in the second half too? We'd all have taken 0-0 if the second half had panned out like the first. Edit: FWIW, I'm a bit disappointed we didn't go for it more rather than playing a containing game, but hey ho

0-3 Time to handover the forum to the doom mongers for 48 hours.

Bugger. 0-2

I think they may have won and gone up to 5th (having played 3 games more than Utd and Arsenal)? But not entirely sure.

At least if it stays this way, Glasgow gets to remind us again how we haven't beaten one of the top 6 yet. For that we should be grateful.

Unless the manager knows more about Gabbi's fitness than the intellects in the crowd?

Right then... Time to revert to game plan B. Let's go for it!

I agree with Glasgow... Great save Forster! Edit... I take it all back

Decent enough first half. Yes, City had most possession by far but that appears to be down to our game plan (sit back and hit them on the break) rather than City dominating against our will.

Yep, agree now. The angle behind the goal is more revealing.

Have watched the replay. Sane nudged it left just as Forster reached for it, which made it look like Forster touched it from the other angles. Edit: actually, just watched the angle from behind the goal and now I'm not so sure!

Forster didn't touch it IMO

This

We're managing the game OK IMO. We're happy to let City have the possession at the moment. They haven't really done anything with it yet

...

Martina instead of Pied on the bench.

Latest scores

Or.... rather than boast about how much money you've got swilling about the place (for a Division 4 club), how about giving some of it back to the people that were shafted by the previous two dishonoured CVAs? No, thought not. #sameoldpompeyalwayscheating