Here is the important quote from the article linked to by the OP. I think the qualifying statements - which I've put in bold type - are very interesting. It's worth thinking long and hard about them.
In the wake of the FA's latest stance, a Tottenham statement said: "We are acutely aware of the sensitivity of this issue.
"Our fans historically adopted the chant as a defence mechanism in order to own the term and thereby deflect anti-Semitic abuse. They do not use the term with any deliberate intent to cause offence.
"We recognise that this is a complex debate and that, in the interests of encouraging a positive and safe environment for all supporters, consideration should be given to the appropriateness and suitability of its continued use.
"We are already in the process of engaging with our fans and shall be consulting more widely in due course."
Some excellent posts on here from Chapel End Charlie and Toon Saint. And the usual inarticulate nonsense from the "pc-gone-mad" brigade. The term Yid is offensive. Don't use it. Full stop.
No.
I ordered something from Amazon UK yesterday; it was dispatched 23 hours later. I'll let you know how long it takes to get here. I ordered something else yesterday - from Amazon Canada. Dispatched 25 hours later. I've always been satisfied with Amazon. Quick and reliable.
He was very fit - don't remember him ever getting injured. Seemed to play virtually every game. Reliable, but unspectacular. I seem to remember him, though, always taking the corners from the right and having great difficulty lifting the ball over the first defender - used to drive me up the wall!
No, he isn't.
Check out, for example, Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Van Morrison, Paul Simon, Joni Mitchell, Ray Davies, Leonard Cohen, Randy Newman, Richard Thompson - and then get back to me.