Toadhall Saint
-
Posts
12,723 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Toadhall Saint
-
His reaction to being carded should have earned him another - simple as. Ref bottled it tho.
-
No one likes us we don’t care!
-
Books better
-
Was great from the moment he came on. Unlucky not to have scored
-
The Middlesbrough 2026 Appreciation Thread
Toadhall Saint replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
👏👏 -
6 2-1 read it and weep you disingenuous bad loser.
-
Brilliant
-
COYRAWM!
-
No downes starting
-
Boro will do the normal and try to kick him out of the game.
-
Downs 🤣
-
Just have to win tonight then see what happens - force their (EFL) hand
-
Baz!!???
-
I’m assuming you are the one that informed the EFL.
-
It’s fookin embarrassing. Like a kids playground- come and join our gang! I can’t see another club wanting to get involved in something that has the potential to be long and drawn out and therefore end up costing money no one has.
-
Make no mistake boro will not be a walkover and they will not keep missing the target. Cool heads will win out in this.
-
Don’t think we have cheated any charities.
-
Playing for time and rightly so.
-
Leeds breached regulation 3.4 we have been charged with doing the same. Plus breaching the new regulation 127.
-
They certainly haven’t been following due process. The efl have made a statement saying no further comment SFC have done the same. Boro - have tried and are trying to influence that process when they should just be waiting for the process to conclude before commenting more.
-
https://www.efl.com/news/2026/may/08/efl-/ the 14 day thing has been brought forward according to the statement from the efl.
-
There was an existing rule that Leeds breached. Which we are accused of breaking as well as the new anti spying rule.
-
So let’s assume we get found to be breaking both the rules. There is the 200k precedent that Leeds were fined (Leeds admitted to multiple occasions) for the existing rule. So breaking that is going to mean a fine of 200k. Which begs the question what do we feel is a “fair” outcome of breaking the new rule specifically aimed at spying? Me, probably the same amount in fine plus 3 point deduction for the specific case of spying on boro.
-
One thing I’m sure of is that we need to stop giving Ayling the freedom he had on Sat.
-
Yep
