pedg

You would have thought that they should have asked players closer to the action and Mikel himself if he heard anything. If they said no (which apparently they did) then they must surely have realised that there was no way that a complaint would be upheld.

As I understand it mikel did not hear it, it was Ramires who thought he heard something, checked with players closer to the action who heard nothing and still proceeded with the complaint. from guardian:

Indeed. If all the trusts valuations are based on the assumption that the area must contain a stadium and a 'football' (loosest sense) club then they can't be valid. Must surely be 'If this area of land was on the open market what would it sell for' irrespective of what the land is currently being used for.

I wonder what leeway there is in what the property developers trust can afford? I can see the judge going "Well its worth more than 2.75 million, but less than 13 million. Lets say its worth 7 million".

I suspect they are blocking new registrations from webmail type addresses.

Yes. Noticed that. I see the guardian summary (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/match/2012/nov/20/portsmouth-v-leytonorient) has Dickinson playing as well but I suspect they may be using the same source of information as the BBC so not sure if that counts for much. well... according to the live text commentary on sky sports Dickinson took a throw in on 41 minutes. But I suspect when they do these commentaries their must be some sort of short cut for entering players names so if the initial team sheet it uses is wrong then this would carry over to the wrong names used on the commentary.

Actually I suspect the BBC team sheet listing is incorrect as if you search the live text there is no reference to Dickinson (could have had a very quiet game of course).

Dock them all the points they have got from their last half dozen matches!! ah... Carry on, nothing to see here.

Post 77777!! which probably has no significance what so ever.

one of these I assume?

See some FAQ's up now. http://www.communitypompey.co.uk/faqs/ Strangely they appear to have missed off one of the most likely frequently asked questions: "I don't want to buy a share, how do I get my £100 back?"

A 5 year loan of 7,000 at the higher rate of 26.80% will mean paying 5774 in interest with monthly payments of £212 (according to http://money.guardian.co.uk/calculator/form/0,,603119,00.html)

What! No mention of them being the first premier league club to go into admin?

Best bet might be to try and borrow an identical NAS to at least get the data off?

How were they arranged in the NAS? I assume they were mirrored? If not and they were stripped then I doubt you will be able to do anything unless you can get them to work in the NAS.

Anyone with a google account can now upload for free up to 20,000 tracks to google play and play them back via any browser or via an android device. https://play.google.com/music/listen

If its just a panorama then used this one to good effect. You don't get a full res image but good enough to post online. http://www.dermandar.com/create/

I think the sites that estimate the cost of making phones have a good reputation for getting it right so though they are estimates they can be trusted to be close to the right value. They are not 'guessing' they make a business out of these evaluations and people would not pay for the results if they were just sticking their finger in the air and coming up with a figure. They examine all parts of the phone and then go through the channels to find out how much they would cost which is why you will often see a detailed breakdown of the cost of the components. As I quoted above there have been a number of people who have tried the nexus 4 and have produces positive feedback on it. Yes it is good that you should reserve judgement till you have held both so maybe you should reign back your scepticism about it until you do?

Touchy... Personally I see a fair amount of logic in have mobile data access on the smaller more portable Nexus 7 while not having it on the nexus 10 which appears to be aimed at being used around the house. As to the data connection you obviously have the choice between having 2 devices (phone and tablet) having separate connections or sharing the same connection. both have pros and cons.

I forgot that its harder to set your iphone up as a wireless hotspot compared to android.

http://blogs.computerworld.com/smartphones/21248/google-nexus-4-hands-on-impressions

Argghh! Its only 'cheap' because it has less of a mark up that other phones. If the iphone was sold with minimal markup at the same price as the Nexus 4 would you say that it felt cheap?

strange given you just said.

What you appear to be deliberately avoiding is the fact that the nexus probably cost as much to make as an iphone 5 but that google are selling it at a much lower markup, if any, compared to the £300 on an iphone (Estimate of cost of making an iphone 5: $168 http://mashable.com/2012/09/14/iphone-5s-material-costs-168/). Don't automatically assume that because you are paying apple a premium price for an iphone that it is made better than cheaper phones.

This will be the nexus 4 with gorilla glass 2 front and back?