pedg

"Hi, this is religion here, sorry we are not in at the moment, we are currently busy infighting and destroying each others shrines. Please leave a message after the amen"

I believe they claim to have a patent on all subatomic particles with rounded corners. They are currently suing the rest of the universe on court and if they win all non iParticles will have to turn back to their state from before the big bang.

How do we know yours is a real higg's boson and not one of those Chinese fakes they are now churning out?

also available on ebuyer http://www.ebuyer.com/390394-higgs-boson-higgs126 (especially like the frequently bought together section) Though I hear apple have leaked they are working on an iBoson so many will be holding out for that I expect.

But people in HR also have to get off their bottoms when someone has to leave. Another thing that anyone at pompey don't have to deal with.

At least the news will be able to have a lot more stories about promising players 'being lined up' to join pompey.

Nice cushy job. 1) Arrive at work 2) Reread memo from league reminding you you are not allowed to recruit any new players 3) Snooze and surf internet 4) Go home

It must be hard job making up all this stuff across continents based on enormous amounts of data and at the same time making sure they all agree what they are making up.

I am glad to hear that your uneducated opinion trumps large amounts of peer reviewed scientific evidence. Lets stop doing research and just ask what you think the answer is shall we?

Just make sure you are not wanted by the police before you go for your cut

Maybe if they had looked further than the end of their noses he would have seen the train wreck coming.

Better to watch it outside of the video embedding at

Apparently it was down the back of the sofa.

I would reply along the lines of: Dear Mr Taylor, Thank you very much for taking the time to reply to my previous query. I wonder if it is possible for you to settle a point of much discussion between myself and some friends. In the case of a club being liquidated what obligations, if any, sit with yourselves and/or the league with respect to the players outstanding contracts? Some people think they will get nothing, others that there is an obligation on others to settle their contracts in full. Many thanks, ...

Can anyone see someone from pompey saying something like this? http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18687492

Not the mention the hush money he got from News International

After debt problems with the people who previously printed their tickets I believe most of the money will be spent on paper, paint and potato's.

Coincidence I am sure... http://www.aboutmyarea.co.uk/Hampshire/Portsmouth/PO6/News/Local-News/225983-International-Crime-Conference-In-Portsmouth

PFA in desperate attempt to save them shelling out to help the players. It does muddy the waters a bit more (if possible) on the 'what do the players get on liquidation' arguments.

Was he one of the claimed 'high net worth' (a.k.a. more money that sense) people the trust have been on about?

Well Bob Diamond does not work for them any more now.

The quotes I have seen imply there are no options (besides sneaking past the police) that would allow him to walk out of the embassy and not get arrested.

The reason for the 'misquote' edit was that I had initially typed my comment in the quote section and moved it out. Anyway my other gripe with that article is the bit at the end where the lawyer implies that because he would be locked up it would be seen as a sign of guilt. You can't complain that locking up pretrial suspects is a common occurrence and then say that the way Assange would be treated implies anything as if you assume locking him up implies guilt then the same applies to every defendant treated that way in Sweden. It's like saying that in the UK most people waiting trial as implied to be innocent because they are usually out on bail. Also it is rather insulting to who ever it is who decided if he is guilty in the court case (not sure if judge or jury) as they should, and one assumes will, take account only of the evidence.

Either he is not granted asylum and he is put on the doorstep and arrested or he is granted asylum but that does not stop him being arrested as soon as he leaves the embassy so he would have to stay there indefinitely.