Jump to content

pedg

Members
  • Posts

    3,636
  • Joined

Everything posted by pedg

  1. Hope the electric was cut off before they could power up the shredders.
  2. I thought it was only the schedule of payment AA could change not the final amount?
  3. Who changed the CVA? Pompey have no control over it now do they except paying for it?
  4. He definitely ticks the boxes in terms of knowing football inside out which would counter some of AA's arguments against him.
  5. The statement from HMRC was they MIGHT get docked up to 20 points. It was not them dictating to the league what to do just telling the judge the sort of punishment the few might receive.
  6. The key in the statement is 'might' not 'will'.
  7. Though CSI and PFC have been acting as a single entity for a while the list of creditors for both companies is different so its hard to see how the judge could approve of AA representing both sets when haggling over a single pot.
  8. Mark: judge has not yet said who administrator will be.
  9. With who as the admin though? That's the question.
  10. Not sure that's true but does the judge?
  11. Is it a coincidence we are approaching post 54321?
  12. Has penny got another administator lined up though? Fine saying another company should be used but they have to agree to take it on.
  13. Last time they were at the courts it was like russian roulette with only one bullet. My feeling is that this time its only one bullet missing, but we shall see.
  14. only post of relevance on twitter from yesterday: Praise for Pompey fans flooding in. Momentum growing for PST bid. Will be talking with supporters direct and others re Friday and beyond.
  15. This one looks like he would have been an ideal owner for pompey.. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/feb/16/arrest-warrant-kazakh-billionaire-mukhtar-ablyazov
  16. Maybe you should post a list of banned items just in case.
  17. Question is why did they need to go to the expense of requesting to order today as they are so sure they will be in admin tomorrow at which point one assumes the accounts are unfrozen??
  18. Previously they were allegedly applying for a validation order to unfreeze their accounts completely. What they claim they were going to apply for today was a very much more limited version just to pay some pressing bills.
  19. It was referenced in one of the news articles that they were going to try for a very specific validation order so they can withdraw a limited amount of money for some pressing bills or something like that.
  20. Any one know the times and places for: The validation order request hearing (apparently 'could' be held tomorrow http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/pompey/pompey-past/andronikou_has_two_targets_1_3521525). The hearing about admin on Friday. The WUO hearing on monday if no admin. ?
  21. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/14930737
  22. I think as far as the rangers case goes I think HMRC's argument was that they were bending the rules on the use of the EBT's rather than that just that they were EBT's.
  23. Another milestone broken. Just past 3,000,000 views
  24. But is it far more attractive or is that just standard Andronikou-speak? I think it all hangs on what affect admin has on the payments for the CVA. If they can get away with not paying that then yes the overall cost will be a lot less but if the buyer still needs to pay chainrai, gady, the players and the CVA in full then they would lose between 80% to 99% of the other debts, which, though significant, still results in a high price tag for a club with an increased chance of ending up in League 1.
  25. 4000 less than saw them play west ham and about 30 less than their match before that against watford on a Monday.
×
×
  • Create New...