pedg

He may say he is going to get his money back and he definitely wants his money back but its difficult to see how that's going to happen unless they find a sap to sell it to.

Think we can be fairly sure there will not be much in the way of pompey news today. Monday and Tuesday are going to be "interesting times" though I suspect. Still amazed how little about this there is in the main media. AA comes out and says they only have days and its not even on the front page of the news website let alone in any of the national papers.

Normally you would assume they meant that the ticket office was only open till 1pm today but refunds can be had at a latter date when the office is open but this is pompey we are talking about.

I hear they tried to get a hot air blower to the ground..... but could not reach AA on his mobile.

Very sensibly got two, one for the home supporters to share and one for the visitors.

They did however cut the print run down to two copies.

Interestingly according to a post on the news website http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/pompey/pompey-past/great-matches/pompey_s_clash_with_tigers_postponed_1_3487816 their OS said but now it says http://www.portsmouthfc.co.uk/LatestNews/news/Pompey-v-Hull-Match-Postponed-3086.aspx How exactly they were going to refund tickets without cash and with frozen bank accounts is not explained.

Oh dear. What happens when we apply the usual AA correction rules to the following statement...

If only redknapp had got 10% of the cost of installing undersoil heating.

Someone on a pompey board claiming pitch inspection bought forward to 9.15. If so should know soon if their match is on (or rather on at the moment as its down as a provisional inspection so even if it passes now one would guess the ref will inspect again nearer kickoff).

I hear its the 'valid' part they are stumbling over.

That's one Kung Fu classic remake I definitely don't want to watch.

This is page 10000000000 binarily speaking. (as actually its 2 ^ 10 pages)

I see AA is doing a fine job selling off CSI assets for top prices. nicked from http://www.thepompeychimes.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=67119&start=15

As Torres mentioned a bit earlier it appears that to get the order you need to provide proof that your company is solvent. Can anyone see the problem here....

Now wouldn't THAT be an interesting read! AA has called for military assistance on that one.

A little task. What was the last statement made by AA relating to the estimation of time by which an event was supposed to happen that was actually correct?

At what point should there be an official record that they are attempting to actually get a validation order rather than just talking about it?

Yes. Assuming your Freesat box supports streaming from the net then it will have an ethernet socket on the back. Alternatively there are a number of compact 'stream' only devices out there.

Hopefully someone will remind the judge and jury: There is proof the account was only accessible by Redknapp. The account was, as far as we know, a normal account with no investment component. No reason why money put into it would not be there later. As far as I am aware the paper record of what went into the account equals what came out of the account.

I will go for 16,347 (inc 600 Hull). Raising enough extra money to refresh AA hair gel supply but little else.

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/campaigns/passion-for-portsmouth/news/brian_howe_not_in_running_to_take_over_pompey_1_3480974 AA's List:

Oh that's okay then. He's an amazing guy who does stuff for charity. Case dismissed.

on this page: http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/business/9390942.Pompey_owners_in_insolvency_proceedings/

No news of the creditors meeting I assume? I notice that according to some of the blue few the allegedly CSI debt is £50 Million