Golac's Cunning Stunts

According to the Express Chelsea are in for Van D-ick, Cedric and Bertrand. As if that's ever going to happen http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/843367/Chelsea-Transfer-News-Antonio-Conte-Virgil-van-Dijk-Cedric-Ryan-Bertrand-Danny-Drinkwater

What the fans booing a few players put us in administration?

https://streamable.com/d9hcg

Bloody hell! Serious?

Two things sprang to mind when I read that: 1. It still leaves a window open to sell if the right offer comes in 2. Saints would be stupid to communicate they are selling van d-ick before buying his replacement, for obvious reasons I like the statement and trust at the moment it's Saints intention not to sell

At one stage they were having to pay us 10 grand every time he completed 20 mins or more of a match. The first season he played for arse Wenger was trying to limit his game time because of it if I remember. Not sure if that is still in force, prob not after all this time

Nice one

Thats funny but he'd probably still be able to show our strikers how its done

Yeah that might make you look clever but means nothing to the average footie fan like me

But selling van d-ick doesn't pay off anything that Mr GAO has paid. vd is an asset of the company and any profits made on his sale don't go straight in the owners pockets surely?

Thats for next year

He's tall enough but criticised for not being as dominant in the air that his height should allow.

Didnt MP prefer to use Eric Dier at CB when Alderwhatshisname was injured last season? Says all you need to know

Your last sentence really makes no sense at all

Example quote (RAWK Meltdown) Has anybody seen this on twitter? Basically a profile that posts quoted from this site and makes us look like bell ends.

Anyone follow rawk meltdown on Twitter? Hilarious. @rawk_meltdown

If I was them I'd sell for 100 mill and get mahrez in for 35. Done far more in prem than coutinho

Not suggesting that mate. When we bought van d-ick we bought someone with potential. Wimmer has none. You happy with signing him? You obviously have better knowledge than I do

So what's your point? That we should settle for second rate? That we shouldn't bother trying to find the next van d-ick? That we should just be happy buying some gash not even better than what we have?

I would seriously hope this guy isn't van d-ick replacement. Nowhere near good enough.

If you can be bothered, go have a look at their thoughts about him on rawk. One guy went as far as saying better than Messi and Ronaldo pmsl

You do make me laugh. You just got that from the Scouse forum didn't you

Yes, Scouse not happy with some of Les's words. All done "in the correct way". I liked the reference to us getting value from the player not just in the short term, but in the years to come :-)

LMFAO did he really...don't remember that :-)

Just asking....will you be a Dutch Scouse in a week or so ��