The Kraken

It shows the toxicity of the man and his lickspittles. MTG is a monumentally terrible hag, but up to now has been one of man baby’s chief cheerleaders. Trump reminds me of one or two morons on here, the likes of who consistently throw out terms like “nazi, socialist, far right” yet clearly don’t have a clue what the term actually means.

He can’t sue in a UK court as there is a 1 year period after initial release of the footage that the claim needs to be made within. That time has come and gone, hence he has filed in Florida. But by everything I’ve read, the law in the US is much less favourable to the claimant than in the UK, and is set up very much to protect the right to free speech for media organisations. Everything I’ve read suggests that Trump has very little chance of winning the case. As you say, the documentary didn’t even air in the US, so its impact to US voters is negligible. I see it as just another example of Trump making a lot of noise and flexing his muscles. As you say his reputation even before the programme was terrible, yet he still went on to win an election; so proving that the documentary materially damaged him would be a big ask.

.

🤣

If only it were the 2004 version of Kelly Brook though.

Go right ahead, you answer my question and I’ll answer yours

You haven’t answered much yet mush. Same question again. Give me a breakdown of the policies in the report you agree with. It should be quite simple to do if you’ve read it.

Stop answering questions with questions. Provide an answer.

I don’t agree with Starmer per se. I’m asking you to provide specifics of things you claim. It’s two different things.

I’m repeating myself because you keep avoiding the question. Have you actually read it? If so, give me a breakdown of the specific policies in the report you agree with.

Have you actually read it? If so, give me a breakdown of the specific policies in the report you agree with. Don’t just say “look at this section”, that is a complete cop out. You're the one claiming that savings need to be made, so you’re the one that needs to be specific. You’ve utterly failed to do that so far, other than point to a multi page report that is no more than a simplistic overview for easily led simpletons

It’s not even interesting it’s just appalling waffle. I doubt Ralph has even read it, let alone has understood its consequences. Or even could.

We both know this. He has at least pointed to a report that on first overview doesn’t really support any of his previous arguments though. In fact it just reiterates his whole ‘savings savings savings it’s easy’ nonsense. It’s kind of funny to watch him go though.

Do me favour, you insinuate you have read it, it’s 132 pages and it’s nearly 10pm on a Sunday night, I’m clearly not going to read all of that report. Being as you seem to have read it all, which pages do I particularly need to read?

Which report?

Good. Tory Tim is an absolute bellend. Get rid of the whopper Robbie Gibb and it can’t get any worse.

Don’t look now, but this is the exact question people ask you when you continually say that there are loads of efficiency savings to be made across the public service. It seems like you almost don’t know what you’re talking about, other than making sweeping generalisations without specifics.

You simply haven’t, or at least nothing I’ve seen. You’ve said things like “the MOD” but no specifics whatsoever. If I’m wrong and I’m missed them then please do re-post them. But I’ve never seen anything specific from you at all.

You’re doing your thing again when you say there’s loads of savings to be made, but you can’t specify where they are. You’ve been asked plenty of times to be more specific and you just return to generalisation. Be more efficient. Make cuts. Savings. Its not really helpful, is it?

Yeah that’s tenuous. Their starting positions were exactly the same, their average positions were different because QPR and especially Wednesday are terrible teams and we actually got further up the pitch in general because we have better players. I agree that Tonka hasn’t had time enough to implement his own style on the team due to the quick fixtures. But I don’t think we will see any material change if he’s still in charge after the international break, he’s baked into the SR 3/5 at the back model.

Yet here with are with SR and it’s a genuine concern that it’s what they really want to do. Absolutely barking mad if we go for him, but I reckon it’s coming.

Just looked it up, you may be right actually. Reports say he “resigned” from Lens at the end of the season to be with his partner in the UK and was appointed by us a week or so later. Whether we actually were in conversations and gave payment to facilitate that, I don’t know.

No thanks.

I don’t wish to go all MLG but Still wasn’t available, was he? He said he wanted to come to the UK for his wife but as I recall he was under contract and we had to do a deal with Lens.

The unholy trinity. The usual suspects. The pile on gang. The geezer really is a weird bloke.