The Kraken

It's unimportant. The PDT have other backup options. I know this because they've said so. Just like they said they were coming into the courtroom for a fight; "let's ave it!!!!", they cried. Some fight that was, they rolled over and begged for some time to think about it all.

And there's the rub really. If you're using the term mong or spaz directly to someone with learning difficulties then the connotation is directly clear; its bullying and its out of order. But using it to one of your mates in jest, the connotation changes entirely. Its akin to calling a mate a cripple after he's been taken out by a hefty challenge on the football pitch and is limping off. Its akin to calling someone blind if they can't see something obvious, or calling people deaf if they don't hear something. All of those are, by the exact definition, mocking the afflicted. But they're not, really. I speak as someone who has a sister who has been severely mentally handicapped since birth. If someone described her as a mong or a spaz then I'd likely find it very offensive. Using it as a general term in parlance with your mates is entirely different IMO, and I don't necessarily have a problem with it. The lady on the radio was entirely correct; she was upset about the terms being used as express and direct terms of bullying towards her and her family. And Ricky Gervais also stepped over that line with his "they" comment. The trick is finding where that line is; and in truth it'll be different for everyone.

The Kraken approves of this.

How is this still going?! Keep on in there pap; love the determination amidst some poorly executed (yet somehow extremely angry) responses. And why is Charlie still talking in the third person?

No it doesn't mean nothing adrian. You may think otherwise, but could have won is a tiny bit different from actually winning. The two are not the same thing, they really aren't. I don't really want to lower my expectations of my side such that I'm 100% satisfied when they could have won. Carry on if that's good enough for you, by all means though. It's just not for me.

That's quite possibly one of the worst written pieces of sports drivel I've ever read. The one sentence paragraphs are bad enough, but the actual written prose is so poorly executed. And how seriously does Neil Allen take himself??!! Really, really bad writing.

The advice I'd give is the same for any golfer with any set of clubs; try a few out, take them on to the driving range (and if possible out on to the course) and go for the one that feels right for you. There is no one club that is thr right one for everyone; it comes down to personal choice.

*gets in the middle with arms outstretched* No! No! Walk away, don't get involved!

Leave it mate; its not worth it.

12 years olds with smart phones. It wasn't like that in my day, hell in a handcart etc etc.

I see where you're coming from, and its a valid point. The flip side is that there's also the possibility that a cup run could galvanise the squad and give us something else to build upon. The JPT was often billed as a distraction but our form from February onwards was actually very good, it was a bit of a myth that we struggled because of cup games. I could see how it could easily go the other way though, so I take the point. Certainly if we stay up this year I'd hope there's never a case where we don't have the FA Cup as a priority.

It was more wishful thinking than anything else. Besides they may get complacent and think their second string is good enough to thrash us anyway.

Perhaps. Or maybe we could just agree that my original comment was part of a list of 9 or 10 factors that RL and NC have/had in common, including the fact that they came to the football club with a similar background that wasn't to do with playing for or running sports clubs.

There is no ideal scenario for what I want. I want a successful side in the championship; but that then leads to the Premier League! In any case, I'm not really fussed. The PL is alright, we may be towards the bottom but at least we have our own mini-league. Just a shame it doesn't encompass the whole league is all. I really hope we give the FA Cup a proper go though. If not, then there's really no point in us being here. Its one thing that we can genuinely look at and hope to win (and fingers crossed Chelsea don't take it too seriously).

www.saints-away.com

The best day I ever had at St. Mary's was staying up on the last day of the season against Sheffield United. Different strokes for different folks. I went to far, far more games in the Championship and League 1 than I had done and do go to in the Prem (I've been to 4 games this season, and while I'll be going to Sunderland and Fulham I'll probably not do too many games in the New Year). Simply put; I'm not too fussed about being in the top league. Its a strange dichotomy, granted; the desire to win all your games and aspire to promotion. I just enjoyed Saturday games much more away from the glitz and glamour of the PL, and going to games is very much the most important thing for me. I'm enjoying the Prem, of course. But nowhere near as much as I did our play-off year. Plus the seemingly non-stop Saturday game, midweek game, Saturday game, midweek game was a brilliant factor. In the PL there's much less games and its all dictated by European schedules, which I find a massive pain the arse.

Its akin to Manchester City v Reading. Man City's first defeat at home in about two and a half seasons or more came recently; against 2nd placed Man United. Man City's record at hom last season was W18 D1 L0. Their record this season was standing up to that until they were beaten by the team in second place. The top of the Premier League is a closed shop. The top of teh Championship isn't. There's your difference.

You really are quite a baffling figure. Did I say they were alike because of one fact? I'm pretty sure I listed quite a few things they had in common; which in itself was a response to an assertion that they had less in common than chalk and cheese. Both of their backgrounds are in banking. Cortese for 10 years at Swiss banks including Credit Suisse. Lowe at London banks including Morgan Grenfell, and Deutsche Bank. If that is poles apart in your world then so be it.

Probably a lot to do with the fact that until recently playing football professionally didn't make you rich. Most former pros had to look to carry on working after they hung up their boots; either staying within the game, owning pubs, Dave Armstrong and Jimmy Case worked for a local office stationery company (Jimmy used to drive the van that delivered to my old office). I'd suggest it'll become more common over the next few years though; as players have the financial capital behind them, and they are also a superstar presence for marketing purposes. Beckham is already receiving all sorts of suitors to front an MLS expansion team, I think its inevitable that some former star players will look to get involved with ownership in the near future.

Not many. Dave Whelan is one the Premier League that does, so its not exactly unknown. Niall Quinn at Sunderland another.

This is going round in circles. If you consider Cortese's background to be a true sporting background then good on you; I don't, so continue to disagree if you wish. I consider Cortese's to be a financial background; the arena he worked in was certainly more valid to the job than Lowe's particular financial background, but both of them came to the job as CEO with little relevant football background experience. Here's a question from the Echo shortly after Cortese joined the club.

Which has nothing to do with being from a sporting background. And remind me what Rupert's background was.

At a means of comparison; I was at Cardiff v Peterboro this weekend, top of the table versus bottom, Cardiff with 10 wins from 10 at home this season, the biggest home banker in football. Peterboro won 2-1, the scoreline could have just as easily been 7-3 to Peterboro. For me it epitomised Championship football; the bottom clubs can always beat the top clubs, its much more unpredictable.

I'm pretty sure I've never seen anyone say that.

It wasn't spot on at all. At least not for the first few games. There was zero proper priority in place for longer term customers; it was simply a case of "buy tickets for this season and you're in, we don't/can't really take into consideration anything before that". At least half a season of points, or favouring ST holders would have been better and fairer than the "oh Christ, this'll have to do" approach that we ended up taking.