Baj

As an investigator, and not wanting to get dragged into the same argument over and over again, i always think im as worried by peoples blind belief in ghosts as i am in other peoples blind disbelief. The "200 years ago" example and based on logic and proof is rubbish kadeem, how would people of 200 years ago accept the basis of a quantum processor, indeed the very fact that quantum physics defies the standard laws of physics when applied to the sub-atomic level. There was no basis of fact for this 200 years ago and it would have been as quickly dismissed as you dismiss the potential of ghosts now. I'm not saying "believe", I'm saying "dont be so bloody close-minded"

About 60% into the movie you will correctly guess the ending, even tho in your head you will be saying "no, no way, they can't do that, that would be sooooo ****"

The worst final 3rd to any plot, ever. I was actually laughing out loud it was that bad, anyone else seen it?

Ill be in jail (that and the fact im recovering from last weeks groin strain).

We rock...

6-0?

Correction. Your perspective is determined by your distance and therefore time from the subject. This is exactly how it looked 400 million years ago, however in order to see the subject in one view, you would need to position your perspective so that it was all in your field of view at the same time, therefore you could never view these galaxies at the same time, as they are right now it would be impossible, in fact on a micro scale, it's impossible to hold a conversation in real time with someone anywhere other than exactly where you are, your now is not the same as someone elses now. Imagine viewing a calendar from one light year away, it would display april 8th 2008. An alarm clock from 1 "light minute" away, would show 1 minute before, 1 "light second" away would show 1 second behind etc. As you can see, you can take this down to a microscopic level to conclude that your perspective of any item is not of now, but in relation to the amount of time it takes light to travel from the article to the viewer.

Since this is a serious discussion, or at least trying to be, can we leave it in the lounge please (which ever mod it was that moved it) thanks

As a ghost investigator, i would say thats 99.99% a moth on the lense of the camera. (the 00.01% reserved for that fact it MIGHT be... a winged ant).

Elite

My hands were cold from wiping the snow off the ball

It helps if you do that sort of thing recreationally anyway....

Well, yesterday was 66%, we wont go into 2 weeks ago tho..... about 20%

How many did you score yesterday?

Actually yeah it is, plus I'll probably post around 3pm and blow the story anyway.

Well since Spade has already outted me on the forum, it's pretty obvious it was me and everyone knows it.

Bit late now

No, I think you'll find blockbuster pay a lot more than £10 for a DVD!

Depends if they guy who's car it was wants to take it seriously, which apparently he does.

They basically just need to take a statement to see if there is any cause for "Criminal Damage", tossers. There shouldn't be any other requests for information since I've come forward as the "culprit"

Have phoned Eastleigh Police station and am going in at 3 oclock to make a statement, should be interesting.

Its no different to buying a dvd then charging people to watch it.

Yes it's illegal, you need specific licenses for the games to allow you to do this

Lmao

lol, or not