Midfield_General

The pioneer of the private executive toilet. Paid for by someone else, of course. The Hannah Ingram-Moore of the football world.

Nope. Verona rumoured to be interested but nothing concrete and as it stands he is still very much here. You don't need to start the Fiat just yet...

Go easy on him. He's spent the morning on another thread comprehensively proving he doesn't understand the EFL regulations either. He thought that if Bazunu got injured once the transfer window had shut that we could just go out and sign another keeper whenever we wanted 🤣 It's not been a good morning for Mr Wrong

Good. A poor signing who made no positive impact whatsoever. That anyone thought he was good enough to play in the Premier League, and then to move KWP out of his best position to accommodate him in the side is embarrassing.

Goalkeepers get injured all the time. On top of the general risk, Bazunu specifically has not long ago been out for 10 months with a ruptured achilles and then another two and a half months with a meniscus injury. He could easily get injured again at any time - any footballer could. In that not exactly unlikely scenario, if you think that a 35 year-old Alex McCarthy is good enough to be starting for a team that is meant to be going for automatic promotion, or that we can potentially afford to put out a weakened team until January and still be serious contenders for promotion, then we are just going to have to agree to disagree. We've just brought in at least £35m. We could have brought someone perfectly competent in for £3-£4m who would have pushed Baz and been better than McCarthy. Instead we've taken a massive, stupid and unnecessary risk in the goalkeeping position by putting all our eggs in one far from reliable basket, and wasted a valuable loan spot into the bargain. I 100% want Spors to succeed, but this on top of the decision to give Stephens a new contract, bringing in a rookie centre back and apparently pinning our goalscoring hopes on Downs, means that as far as I'm concerned he's now made a series of massive gambles concerning three absolutely critical positions. Maybe the Spertsyan signing will make it all worthwhile? Oh no wait, he got played like a complete fool for that as well. I hope the rest of the window is fucking spectacular because as it stands he appears to be making us less competitive with every decision he makes.

See below. I sincerely hope we don't have to find out.

.

Opinions on Bazunu aside, the point is that this decision means that we are now one serious injury to Bazunu away from having McCarthy as our first choice goalkeeper for the season.

Bless you. Don't ever change, MLG 😛

No, you are completely wrong. Let's focus on after the window shuts which is obviously the point. The rule is EFL regulation 58. The EFL emergency goalkeeper rule only allows you to sign a new keeper, and only on a 7-day emergency rolling loan deal, if all of your senior goalkeepers are injured or ineligible to play. So if you have any fit senior goalkeepers, you are not eligible for an emergency loan and you have to play the one you have and cover the bench with a youth keeper. There is no rule that says you have to have three senior goalkeepers in your squad. So if Bazunu breaks his leg or gets a serious injury on 2nd September, or at any other point during the season, McCarthy is our keeper for the rest of the season and Long is the second choice. And I couldn't give a fuck if McCarthy had a few competent games 18 months ago. He has been average his entire career and is now 18 months older than he was then. He is obviously not good enough to be picked as a starting keeper for a team expecting to go for automatic promotion. So this decision means that if Bazunu gets injured, we are absolutely fucked.

To use an analogy, in a critical position we have now put literally all our eggs in one extremely unreliable basket. Why would you voluntarily take such a risk? I’m actually stunned at how pointlessly risky and inept this is. It is a huge, huge gamble that we didn’t have to make. We’ve just been given £40m. Spend £3m of it on a solid, proven Championship keeper like any of those who have been mentioned who is better than McCarthy and capable of pushing Baz, alleviate the risk and move on. But no. Instead take a massive unnecessary risk and fill the squad with more dross. Also what the fuck has Bazunu done that’s so special that he gets to be the only player in the squad with no competition for his place? Has he got photos of Spors or something? No club does that, especially not in such a key position. To all those saying it doesn’t matter because it’s only a third keeper, this decision now basically makes Baz undroppable for any game that matters, regardless of form. I hope you’re comfortable with that, but I’m fucking not. It’s an absolutely ridiculous ‘strategy’. Even if Spors pulls something major out of his arse in the next week, I am asking serious questions about his competence now, that he thinks this is a good approach.

No, making this signing is taking an enormous risk in a key position that can be the difference between getting promoted or not. It creates three issues: 1. The jury is very much out on whether Baz is a good enough no. 1 to start with 2. Now he has no credible competition for his spot, there is no-one to keep him on his toes, and we have no real options to swap him out if his form drops off 3. Let’s say he breaks his leg tomorrow. What then?

Dragan’s put loads of money in. He’s just allowed most of it to be spent really badly.

Exactly. There should be proper competition for all places. It's mad to have any player in any position where you and they just assume they are going to get picked every week no matter what. Every player in the team should have someone snapping at their heels so they know that they are likely to lose their place if they don't perform every week. Even in the training videos posted by the club after Still joined the new goalkeeping coach was jokingly calling McCarthy 'the old man'. As it stands it's pretty obvious he's not considered credible competition for the no. 1 unless there's an emergency.

It was in response to a post which mentioned him. But yeah I didn’t think you - or indeed anyone - could possibly believe that, hence the clarification.

Sorry, are you suggesting that the thing Adam Armstrong needs is more game time?

No - he actually managed to be worse than that by picking no striker at all, or picking two and having them out on the touchlines with literally no-one in the middle. Arma as a 9 is an absolute disaster, yet it still makes more sense than some of the things that that idiot did. And continues to do, looking at the absolute shambles he’s now created at Rangers as well.

I’d love to know what his coaching team really think/say when he’s not around. Obviously he gets them all nicely paid jobs by taking them with him to each new club but are they true believers in what he’s trying to do, or do they just go along with it to get paid and because they know it’s a waste of time challenging it? Pretty much any football fan off the street could set up a team to successfully counter a Martin side at this point. They are professional coaches, they must be able to see the glaring issues that repeat themselves week in week out. Are they just pure yes men looking to rinse a meal ticket for as long as they can at this point? Anyone on here ever coached at a decent level and experienced anything similar where you have to decide whether to challenge it and possibly get bombed out, or just keep quiet and get paid for as long as possible even though you can see how flawed it is? A penny for ‘Gilly’’s thoughts. Which is a phrase I never thought I’d say.

Just saw the St Mirren goal. Rangers on the attack, gave it away on the edge of their opponent’s area who were waiting for it to happen, two passes into the wide open spaces left in behind and the entire team turned around for a 1 v 1 - goal. How many times is he going to give that exact same goal away? It happens time and time again. The opposition are just waiting for the opportunity to spring it. Swansea fans talked about it and we saw it over and over again but he still doesn’t change it and clearly none of his coaching staff have got the balls to challenge him on it. It’s absurd.

BBC Scotland going in two-footed. 'Another day, another debacle for Martin': https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn0275y3ey8o

Excellent. Thank you for the clarification. I hope you’re right.

I'm not writing him off. That's not the point or the question. My question, for the third time, is: You said that Armstrong, Archer, BBD, Stewart and Downs were a good enough set of striker options to score enough goals to get promotion. So for the third time - do you stand by that, yes or no?

Why are you talking about positions or who Still picks? That is completely irrelevant to the point. The point is that you said that if Saints had BBD, Armstrong, Archer, Downs and Stewart as our striking options then that would be fine and we wouldn’t need to sign anyone else up front because between them they were good enough options and would score enough goals to get us promoted. Because BBD, Archer, Armstrong and Stewart had done it before at this level and Downs had done it in Bundesliga 2. You said that Adam Armstrong and Ross Stewart are 'prolific' at this level, and on July 5th (with our striking options the same as they are now) you said we have a 'top 3 squad'. Nothing about positions or who out of those players gets picked. Just that the forward options were strong enough and we didn't need anyone else. Do you still stand by that? Again, it's fine to change your mind and admit your judgement was poor, if you'd like to.

It’s got nothing to do with the other two. You specifically said that having those three strikers - Armstrong, Archer and BBD - was good enough to get us promoted because they’d all scored goals at this level before. Are you sticking with that? It’s fine to admit you were wrong.

So who still thinks Armstrong, Archer and BBD are good enough striking options to get us promotion, because they've scored goals at this level before? @Matthew Le God - still sticking by that?