Turkish

that's not playing devils advocate that's asking someone to speculate on something it's impossible to answer. Why have some people who haven't had a vaccine not even had it once? Why have some people who've had 4 vaccines had it twice? Why did someone who hadn't had a vaccine have it but not even know they did. Why, why, why why....

Does it prevent you getting it? I've had 3 vaccines and had it twice. My wife got it about a month after having the 3rd vaccine, she's also had it twice. I know loads of people of have had it since getting the vaccine. None of them have been seriously ill. A good friend of mine was seriously ill with it and nearly died before the vaccine, he also got it again after being vaccinated and was not seriously ill. No doubt it prevents against serious illness but im not convinced it prevents you getting it.

That’s was the claim wasn’t it. It appears that was made before there was proof that was true..

Unsurpringly you’re missing the point, not for the first time, so let me spell it out to you it appears it was claimed that the vaccine stopped transmission. We were told if you don’t have one you’ll kill your nan. Yet it appears the claim and guilty tripping was made before any testing had been done that confirmed if it did or didnt reduce transmission. clear now? as for your typical childish “don’t piss you pants” aintclever bingo comment I’m not pissing my pants about anything, merely raising a discussion point that is currently in the news. Sadly once again you don’t seem bright enough to comprehend when someone posts something that is opposed to your simplistic view of the world it doesn’t mean they’re automatically they’re upset about it.

BioNTech vaccine scientist says jab could halve Covid transmission | Coronavirus | The Guardian That's not what was said here, just before it was released.

The Adrian Durham on Radio Solent, perhaps?

IIRC correctly most we're over the moon. We'd got rid of the deadwood, Redmond, Stephens, Bednarek, Forster and replaced them with a load of young, hungry, guarenteed to improvers, which is what everyone had been demanding. Bit of disappointment we hadn't got rid of Walcott, but other than that the only one people were sad to see go was Romeu, but even him many were saying was past it and his legs had gone. None of this "worst squad in the premier league" shite then. Like you say the narrative has hugely shifted in the last few weeks.

Listen to it. The narrative was get a vaccine to protect others, if you don’t get one you’re selfish and you’ll kill your nan etc. turns out that there was never tested to stop transmission.

Interesting news coming from Pfizer 🤔

Adam Blackmore September 2022 adam Blackmore October 2022 “Name a premier league squad worse than Saints” full of it

Yes you are. Well, your other logins were.

Fake news. This is all a scam by the Germans to prove how safe the vaccine is. They think we are idiots.

He’d be great fit for us. Loves a bit of virtue signalling, he’d fit right in with the image our PR department want to put out of us as a club.

That’s a very idea. He’s perfect for that role. Need to find something for him to do.

Ah yeah, I saw Tom Huddlestone had signed for Man United in some sort of mentor capacity, it’s really odd.

So we’ve improved significantly since Lancashire got sent off?

Is is true Pompey fans were singing “1-0 in your big day out” Pompey fans who have put out a majority first team and first team manager 🤦‍♂️

Yep, mixture of testosterone with the kids, the ones who play actually want to be there now rather than because their parents make them or their friends play so it becomes much more competitive. We have that issue now with the U11s where probably only 3 or 4 will carry on, it’s the same every season. However we play in a district league at the moment which is all mainly village teams. At U12s when it goes to 11 a side the 8 teams in the league merge to become 2 U11 teams and go and play in the district league with lots of teams from Harrogate York and Leeds. There is one team in that league which is like what you describe, kids are cocky little shits and coaches think they are something special and a few ex Leeds players have had kids go through the team, plus they market themselves very well so get a lot of sponsorship from local business. I can’t really comment on the ref situation above U11s at the moment but a friend of mine who coaches U13s said on of his got booked recently for calling the ref a twat. 🤣

You don’t need to read between in the lines, in that clip I shared he said “where did the arrogance come from?” the arrogance that after 10 years of premier league money we’ve had to sell to buy for most of it and when we do have a bit of cash we spunk it all on a load of kids who, according to Blackmore, have made us the worst squad in the league.

Appreciate this is written from a Pompey perspective but we get a few mentions at the bottom and some pictures of the cup game in 1984. I know some you just want see what name each other had on the backs of their shirts in 2004 but some might find this a good read as it’s not the usual fackin scummers nonsense they come out with and some good style nostalgia from the terraces in the 80s https://lowerblock.com

He was pointing the finger at SR the other day with the article about Ralph being on the way out. He obviously gets on well with Semmens and Ralph. Can’t help but feel this is basically been set up as PR stunt by the current board to get the fans on Ralph’s side

doesn’t sound like this is going to be neutral. Saints fans are arrogant to expect us to be comfortable, Ralph is building a new squad, loads of other clubs have underachieved 🙄

Yep that’s it, all incidents are reported to the league who then notify the club secretary. Also clubs get random visits from the league and FA to make sure they have all the correct things in place, respect barriers etc and watch the behaviour of parents and kids. It’s all taken very seriously

It's not a question of intimidating children, stamp on the arguing back from the start and be firm and consistent but also fair and approachable. You dont have to be like a little hitler but that approach generally nips any on pitch aggro in the bud. At grass roots level it comes down to the leagues and the clubs to sort out the behaviour of their players, parents or supporters. At the club i coach at and in the league we are in we have very strict rules of what isnt acceptable. Parents have to agree to a code of conduct when they sign their kid up, have to stand behind respect barriers, not shout at the ref or players etc. We've had to tell a couple of parents they aren't welcome due to their behaviour, if they dont like it then we point to what they agreed to when they joined the club and if they dont like it then they are not welcome If that means they take their child to another club so be it. You tend to find that usually sorts out the issue. Unfortunately it seems a lot of clubs dont have the same set of rules.

I have to ref kids football, kids of 9 and 10 years old at the moment. I've not had any abuse probably because i'm a 6 foot 15 stone skinhead that would be able to snap most of the snobby parents where we live in half. The kids are fine as long as you're firm and consistent, some refs have got abuse and been called names but i stamp any aruging back out straight away with a point at the whistle and a glare. Maybe we should look to get more decent lads that wont stand for any abuse as refs than people that look like accountants and moderators on football forums?