View From The Top

He got it wrong at Brizzle and left it too late to change it and he got it very, very wrong today.

Fox was shi t and Morgan at the tip of the diamond? Nah, that was wrong, but his views about us being gash and not looking like scoring is spot on.

There today were you? If you were you'd know that he's spot on.

We are all chuffed where we are but that doesn't alter the fact the last weekend and today were were s h it. Totally and utterly gash and I would defy any one who actually saw both performances to say otherwise. If we want to go we must improve our away form a 0pts from 2 teams in the bottom 3 speaks volumes.

Shut up you stupid bint.

But not as the target man. He is better as the typical number 10.

And Guly is not a striker. Adkins got it badly wrong today.

Rich, that was ****, even worse than Brizzle. Play like that at fratton and we will get dicked.

You keep clinging to singing Henry's name, it's all you have.

Correct.

They deffo out?

You would simply because he's your next target regardless of what he says. For an obviously bright bloke you act as a right tool at times.

Been told that all of our tickets will be going up on the supporters coach, no problem, as they understand that not everyone can collect them from SMS.

If you read this thread I say that I believe he did exist, however, that does not alter the fact that there is no primary evidence that he did, or at least evidence that has been released from the Vatican archives. If there was prima facie evidence you'd think, in these secular times, it would be released. I'd love to know what the Vatican actually hold, including the testaments that were rejected at the Council of Nicea

I watched it as well and found it fascinating and a compelling argument, however, that still doesn't alter that it's conjecture and cannot be proven as fact.

The FL will do naff all as pompey aren't in administration.

You are falling into the trap of taking interpretation of events as fact. A few scientists tied them together which was disputed by others, either view, or neither view may be correct.

In the same way someone with a MA is somewhat more qualified than a mere enthusiast Schama, Beevor etc are somewhat more qualified and experienced than TLS. It's like comparing apples and pears.

I don't dispute that at all, I'm merely pointing out that they cannot be used as facts as they are not primary sources but certainly are useful when placed in context.

Yep, BHA sold out.

As he has an MA in the subject I would suggest he has more passion than someone who merely reads history books.

Of course it has, hugely for at least 1500 years. One could even argue that the King James's Bible is the singularly most important book ever published in the English language. However, that doesn't alter the fact that no serious historian considers the bible as a factual source and there is no primary evidence that Jesus existed, or at least none that isn't held in some Vatican vault! Far too many folk confuse interpretation of events by historians with facts. The two are not the same.

My thoughts entirely.

But they aren't in administration, CSI are.

All my 1st ballot tickets are showing up so I gave them a bell and asked about the 2nd ballot, in which I've applied for 2 mates, and was told they'd be done by the end of next week. Hope so as I have to pick up the coach tickets after the Blackpool game.