hypochondriac

As you love to label yourselves you mean.

Paid!

wasnt Jason Euell on 15K a week in the championship that is mental.

Unlikely. They would have to prove they have the funds, especially with the pfa involvement. As someone said it is probably the property developers.

Absolute rubbish. I laugh at you.

I probably would but we are doing really well so it's hard to criticise, even though it would be good if some things were a little different.

Apparently they have matched the 8 million compromise agreements from Chanrai. Not sure how.

Erm they won't be borrowing anything from the council.

The absolute worst thing is we are going to see a load more of those 'emotional' articles from the News.

They have been going on and on and on about how they have the best fans in the world. Now is their chance to prove it!

Lol. Always loved Adam Blackmore

I doubt that.

That joke got you banned last time.

Contrast that with the awful experience I had the one time I stayed after a game at sms. It is very disappointing.

Euro 96 was the last time we did well

I heard two things. Either he ripped all the floors up or he refused to pay the rent as the swimming pool was not working. Either is amusing.

That's despicable really

Pretty sure he is joking...

I danced on stage with mlt who was dressed as Elvis Presley. Still love the bloke but hope he leaves it now

For me the irritation is two fold. One is mlt for continuing this with no actual information on why he dislikes him so much. Come out and tell us what is bothering you and I will most likely be on your side considering you are a legend in my eyes. Secondly is Simon peach for thinking there is a new story here so writing something that says nothing original and only goes over old ground. The he is normally a very good journalist btw.

This. That is exactly my stance.

I already edited above and apologised

But is there really anything different from what has been said on a number of previous occasions? The article doesn't say anything original to my mind and without specifics it looks like stirring,

What light has he shed on it though Chris? If the article said something new or substantial then I would be applauding him but it doesn't so it just looks like muck raking and going over old ground again. When even I'm tired of it then you know it has been overdone! Edit sorry I see you have already answered that. Well if he tried to get interesting information from matt and failed then really he should use his own journalistic judgement and not write anything if there is nothing new to tell. Unless of course he wanted the moolah...

Yes except that before the article Simon came on here and said he was only interested in the truth and then he never told us anything that matt hasn't said before.