hypochondriac

He's already shown he is happy to do a job for lesser premier league teams (rather than just going to the big ones) so we probably have a decent chance of getting a young english defender for five million. Good business if true.

C*nt

Moaning about people moaning. Sigh.

We obviously are not going to sign him. Give it up.

Not news of a departure.

He is a loser. He has never won anything that is important. It is obvious that Federer only tries his hardest in the slams (and his home tournament in Switzerland) because they are what count in tennis.

Then fair play to him. To win four slams will be a big achievement. He hasn't yet though and so he is still a loser.

We are going to end up with a championship dream team ha.

I don't think it had anything to do with luck. In the end Roger was vastly superior over the entirety of the match. He is the best player of all time.

If that's what you want to consider success. I'm certain that Andy himself would consider that failure.

hehehe. Doh.

Nadal was a loser in this tournament yes and I'm sure he would be the first to admit that. Nadal though has also won absolutely loads because he is a winner. Murray has never won anything that matters. He is a loser. Do you see the difference?

Nope. Fair play if he beat Federer. He was quite lucky in that he had a fairly easy side of the draw but if he had managed to do it then I would have held my hands up and said well done. He didn't though he lost like usual.

Very short. Federer was totally in control after the first set. Congratulations to Federer who is a born winner and just amazing. Murray continues to be a loser.

It's completely different. The NPC s a totally different competition to the premiership for a start. I was always pleased that we have got to the Premiership but of course it isn't the same as winning the Prem. We won't go down in football history for getting promotion.

This but uttered in a hushed voice.

Judging by his comments (that TDD has highlighted and that I was unaware of) it seems that Murray would disagree with you.

Good I'm glad. Seems that he contradicts his supporters who say how amazing he is and what a fantastic job he has done.

Some of his shots I just laugh at. He is truly the greatest player to have ever picked up a racket.

Break for Federer. He is unbelievable.

I would love to see Merrington attempting that.

Good, Murray recognises that he himself is a loser and knows what he has to do in order to rid himself of that title. Maybe I will like him a bit more.

Nope he achieved more than Henman. That doesn't really matter though. If he continues to fail to win a grand slam then he will continue to be thought of as a loser. Quite right too.

Winning a grand slam is what matters. Do you think that Federer calls it a good tournament if he loses a grand slam final? Of course not, he calls it a disastrous tournament because the man is a winner. When Murray won the semi everyone acted as if he had won the tournament already. He hadn't.

If he loses that is totally irrelevant.