hypochondriac

Cheers Verbal. That is exactly my point.

Have to win the final first. Would be good though.

:cool:

I don't think Jackson has much to do with the bid. IMO there are more sensible people in charge.

But we don't know them. Perhaps I should have said no one knows on here HTH.

Most of us could have done a lot better when Wilde came to town. We had a big say on what went on IMO.

No one knows HTH.

Exactly. SOG wants to erase it from history as if it never happened. I would think now would be the ideal time to reflect on the season and to work out where it all went wrong.

That's odd because at least four people have said that the party that MJ (and others from here) are in some way involved with are the ones who have made the bid. Are you sure of your info?

What if it was not MJ who is really involved but other people who are actually sensible. I heard it was more to do with Fry making things difficult rather than lack of finance.

Pancake I r*ped you. http://link-power.mybrute.com/fight/166673871

I f****d you up bean counter.

During the season it was "get behind the team, the inquest can start afterwards." Now it's "Let it go that's the past." I'm interested in the mistakes of this season because I've had to sit through it all.

Hence the blue square enquiry?

Again does that excuse Lowe?

Before lowe came we stayed up and crouch doing lowe's job for free. After lowe relegated us and charged us 100k for the privilige.

Maybe to you but considering the bank pulled the plug over "peanuts" we could have done a lot with that money.

It's a ridiculous wage considering the hours he worked, that Portvliet was on a lot less and that (allegedly) Crouch was paid nothing for the same role.

So does tha excuse Lowe's actions? Don't be silly and be honest, it's a ridiculous wage for a team in our position.

It's obscene and makes a mockery of Lowe saying that Pearson was not kept on due to financial considerations.

Especially if Marc Jackson is involved.

Do you disagree?

Seemed to me he was saying there was no MJ involved to the best of his knowledge in the initial bid. We don't know how involved MJ is with his bid and we don't even know if they were he initial bid who Weston had dinner with. It is possible that Weston was correct and NickG

TBF he didn't actually say that MJ had no involvement with a bid, just that the guy he went to dinner with said nothing about MJ. We don't actually know HOW involved MJ is either. He's probably got a much biggr role in this in his mind.

Will most likely never happen. What is it for do you think?