hypochondriac

None of this makes sense. Basically it's rather unlikely we will overtake them but it's not as unlikely as some posters like to claim. It would require them to lose to Leeds and possibly lose to us as well and would probably require us to win all the games in between.

I'd wager that if you put it to a vote, Wade's jokey contributions to pre match threads would be infinitely preferred by the majority on here than your reactions to his posts. Maybe this just isn't your audience.

That'll be neither then

This page is 49 pages long. 90%+ of it is about Israel. No doubt in a few posts after this there will be discussion of Israel again. I wouldn't let it upset you.

Agreed. Leeds smash it, we beat the foxes a few weeks later and they shit themselves. They drop a few more points and we go up as champions with Leeds second. Easy.

Oh right. Because it's impossible to discuss two things simultaneously. It's not like someone being accused of antisemitic posts and then refusing to address it, instead choosing to attack posters rather than address the substance of their complaints, isn't relevant to this thread. It's hardly preventing discussion about Israel which is what 99% of this thread is and no one is preventing you from talking about it as is clear in the previous pages. Hard to think you wouldn't be quite so quick with a defence if you didn't agree with him on this issue.

If they lose to Leeds and fail to beat both hull and Sunderland then they really will be getting a squeaky bum.

I can 100% see Leeds winning against Leicester next week which means we have to win our next two. Do that and Leicester will be starting to get nervous if we are five behind them and Leeds 6 behind. Any further slip on their part and any one of three teams could be above them. Pressure does funny things to teams, particularly if you've been top all season.

Shame we couldn't have beaten Bristol. If we'd won that and our game in hand the gap would have been down to 5.

I think if you're going to accuse someone of playing the poster and not the post, then soggy is pretty much the main culprit.

You've always been a true believer, even when I wavered.

It's back on lads!

Not sure about that. Burnley pissed the league last year playing a similar style and now they are down the bottom and about to be relegated again. There's a giant difference between championship and prem.

Well then I don't think sky categorise clubs in that fashion. Not sure why you think they would.

I would imagine we attract significantly more eyeballs than Bournemouth for example.

Not sure you can compare saints to Bournemouth, Luton and Brentford. Palace maybe and possibly Brighton.

I want to see how Downes, THB and maybe even Brooks and KWP fare together in the prem. Robbing us of the chance of seeing that is why promotion this year is so vital.

Kudos to Stephens as well who was very good in an unfamiliar position. Much preferred him there to Manning...

That sounds like a good thing rather than a bad thing ha.

Must admit, I was pretty worried about them. I could eat those words...

Badly need a second here. Good start though.

But confused why we didn't bring in another lb if we weren't going to play Meghoma.

Probably see us smash them now but on paper that's a rotten lineup.

Place your bets. Downes in or out? I say out.

I think in skne ways it's simpler than that. Many on the left define the world through a series of relationships between an oppressor and the oppressed. If there's some inequality they explain that because those who have or are less have been opressed by someone or something else. They see Israel as an oppressor and so that means that Israel and it's citizens can never truly be victims.