hypochondriac

We clearly wanted to keep Adam. All I'm saying is ill be happy when we manage to get one of these big players to re-sign. Saying they are more likely to sign doesn't actually change much.

Agree with this. We heard a lot of nice words last summer but it ultimately came to nothing. I'll be praising the club once Clyne signs and not before.

Along with Morgan, Toby is probably the best player in our squad. I would be extremely surprised if he stayed but pleased!

Does it? I didn't hear that in the interview. Personally if we lose Morgan, Toby and Clyne and keep the rest then I'll be satisfied with that. If we keep any of those three then we will have done brilliantly well as long as we keep all the others.

That is bloody brilliant.

Not sure why this is continuing. I accused you of reacting to the poster rather than the post on a number of occasions. You admit that actually you do do this with certain posters. You've qualified it by saying you get bored of the rubbish they post and by calling them exceptions but it seems that in general we agree. So there isn't much of a disagreement.

Don't worry, he's said he can't be arsed now which is his equivalent of admitting he was incorrect and apologising. Fair enough.

If pap had just conceded the obvious in the first place instead of conceding it but calling them exceptions then it wouldn't have got this far or become this dull.

Confirms a lot of stereotypes imo.

You still aren't getting it. I wasn't referring to myself and how you react to me, I was talking about your posting in general. Shall I just keep repeating that till you understand? It's nothing to be ashamed of, I do it quite a bit myself but let's not pretend that you react objectively to every post regardless of the poster.

What has that got to do with your behaviour on the forum? Not sure how many times I have to tell you it isn't about me, no matter how many times you try to deflect. I was just saying that you frequently play the poster and not the post. Certainly as much as Jeff and I do on here.

We've seen your M.O from the conspiracy threads. When you got challenged- even in a cordial manner- you got sarcastic and personal. Happens a lot (and again I'm not talking about myself, odd that you keep thinking I am.)

Much more balanced view from you there in my opinion and I do agree with some of it. I think from that we can agree that not everyone who voted tory are heartless and selfish people.

Why do you think I was referring to myself? You continually play the poster and not the post. I didn't mention myself.

Pap does that at every opportunity. Not sure why you just mentioned me and Jeff.

So I presume when you mentioned me you actually meant the right? Because as I already mentioned, I've supported labour in the past so I don't really consider myself right wing.

It was a joke verbal. I know you find them difficult to comprehend...

nothing wrong at all mate. Is it wrong that I picture you as lieutenant data?

I love this thread.

Wheb you consider how much we paid for long, then it's a bargain.

I think one of the main reasons was simply that many people didn't want to feel a little bit embarrassed when they saw ed on the world stage representing our country. It's shallow but it wouldn't surprise me if that was what a lot of people thought.

So you reckon the majority of voters don't think about what's best for themselves and the issues they care about when casting their vote? Interesting. Makes you wonder why ed bothered with populist policies at all if he was simply trying to appeal to the voters who only thought of what was best for the country. I've given this example before, but one reason I voted conservative at this election is because I thought they were better for my business. When my business does well I'm able to pay all of my staff a lot more (some of my staff earn more than me.) how is that selfish?

As a disabled person, what views of mine do you find astonishing?

No one mentioned all lefties except you?

I disagree. You told me off for suggesting that and that no one had said that. They had.