hypochondriac

The irony when you are doing the exact same thing with always sfc is staggering. Let's be honest you wouldn't have even contemplated replying to this which didn't reference you in any way if it wasn't for the fact that I was the one commenting. I didn't answer you when you asked if I had ocd because I don't and I considered it another pathetic jibe from yourself trying to be vaguely insulting. I can't think of a condition that explains your behaviour - maybe it's simply that you are a pathological liar or simply ill informed and a bit thick but I don't have much interest in knowing. Regardless of any of that here is another example of your hypocrisy in action- chiding others for daring to discuss terrorism or posting images as insensitive yet inventing a fictional diagnosis of a serious condition to try to score a cheap point on an Internet forum. Pathetic from you as usual. I've answered a multitude of bone headed questions from you, I have little interest in answering any more.

You and soggy appear to be following each other around the board so I could say the same of you two. Your childish ripostes are quite frankly pathetic, particularly because in that old thread dredged up recently from years ago you were having a moan along with everyone else. You're just as guilty of having a moan on occasion and why you feel you have to post on multiple threads insulting anyone with a negative option I'll never know. But keep doing it if it keeps you amused and I'll continue to highlight how pathetic it is.

You have the self awareness and world knowledge of an infant but even little children I know are aware that lying is wrong so it's difficult to compare you. The fact I suspect you are a pensioner or close to that is even more depressing for you. You have my pity.

Astonishing if true. Sounds about 12...

That's fine on the issue of wages but doesn't address any of my other points. Do you feel that they should get more moderate union leaders in the media? (if such a thing exists of course.)

It's a shame if what you say is true that the only ones we get in the media are the militant ones only in it for themselves on obscene salaries who are desperate for any excuse to strike. It really does give all unions a bad reputation.

Bit unfair on Shaw who was looking great before his injury.

Dave will be bricking it if they do reject it. What will most likely happen is they will change the wording to make it even more ineffective but dave will pretend it is still essentially the same thing.

And why would anyone pretend that there isn't?

Don't be silly. Forster was great today but kelvin at Leeds was freaky.

I heard one of her relatives on the news earlier (may have been him.) He said she should get time off her sentence for coming back. Why?

Agreed he was the best and most even handed person on the show (despite others having a problem with him talking.) it's made me want to discover more about his organisation at any rate. Interesting to see some of the Muslims in the audience who were challenging the line that Islam was blameless in all of this and that the US were primarily to blame for discord.

I watched that this morning. The person walking out and claiming BBC bias was pathetic. The poor bloke trying to have his say without getting interrupted meant that many of the Muslims in the crowd appeared to be extremely close minded and aggressive. I thought it was a shame and a missed opportunity to put a positive face on their religion to the nation.

How terrible. Not sure that the headline fits with the description? In the article it says an eyewitness saw three people beaten, we're these people children? As you say horrible regardless but would be interesting to know.

Everything is so simplistic and black and white with you.

What you do is the equivalent of Batman and his daily mail links. You are the opposite side of the coin.

Kindly never deny that you run away from answering questions again.

Thanks Gemmel for your contribution. For a while I guessed he was doing it deliberately but it's hard to not come to the conclusion that he genuinely doesn't understand how this thread makes him look. Ah well.

Stop grizzling because he didn't dignify your pathetic pm with a response and give you the attention you so obviously crave.

It's a public message board I didn't realise the rules were you could only reply when a post is addressed to you.

Sorry there is a question there that requires an answer is there?

Why would anyone want to respond to a pm from some random bloke asking what their problem is on a message board? What sort of response were you expecting?

Regardless of whatever anyone thinks, that is scaremongering at its finest solent stars.

It's good you're here to stick up for him.

Oh God you've started soggy off on this thread as well. It's like a virus.