hypochondriac

Really bizarre comments from lawro this week. Not sure how he can say he doesn't know where osvaldo fits in when he has played one half and we haven't bought a lot of players in we have brought in three!

No need to fight guys. Their third kit is awful and so is our home kit.

He didn't really have a pop, more saying that the glam lifestyle isn't really for him. Fair enough.

Hmm. Bullsh*tter?

Lol. Well played.

What does an erection sound like?

..says the man who a couple of years ago decided to stop supporting saints and get an Arsenal season ticket instead.

There are two separate points there, one about America and London acting inappropriately and introducing too many restrictive laws after terrorist attacks. On those two points I broadly agree and I am under no illusions that America is just as guilty in many cases as the countries they invade. The other points are about you seeing conspiracies in every atrocity. If we accept your theory about governments clamping down on freedom after atrocities, could it not be possible that these bad things just happened independently of any conspiracy (which I believe is what the majority think happened) and that the governments then used these as opportunities?

Yep I agree with that though I do think we should support action if they can prove that they have used chemical weapons against their own people.

The great dictator?

He was making a speech on behalf of the youth Parliament.

I don't disagree and I'm no champion of America. I fail to see what relevance that has on the Boston bombing and London being faked by actors. It would be nice if you responded sensibly for a change instead of idiocy about knowing more people than I do.

The same could be said of you. You didn't address my other points either.

I'm too lazy to look online for the answer. Could you just post a step by step guide for me with diagrams and things? Thanks.

And here was I thinking this would be about Martin Luther King.

Every person I have ever met who talks of 9/11 conspiracies has been what I would refer to as a nut. Seeing that American bloke on the BBC a few weeks back reinforced that point. I don't understand your talk of bubbles.

Bit patronising dont you think to suggest that the only reason you cop flack is because you dare to present a differing point of view? I would say it is because some of your conclusions appear laughably outlandish to a lot of sensible people. Of course it is possible that I have been brainwashed by western media propaganda but I would consider it very unlikely and it is perfectly possible to hold a healthy distrust of those in power in the West yet still not come to the conclusions that you have (ie that the London attack involved actors posing as civilians or that the US government faked the Boston bombings.) It is very possible that governments lie to us and that they do things that we do not know about, I just consider it virtually impossible that they would be able to pull off something like 9/11 or the moon landings and get away with it without anyone knowing. The way you present it it is as if you are the enlightened one because you question every single event you hear about whilst everyone else are morons because they consider each case and if it seems highly improbable to be a conspiracy then they mostly dismiss it. On the subject of Syria I agree that we need to wait for concrete proof rather than go in all guns blazing as we have been burnt before. I think everyone agrees that America are hypocrites and no one is labelling you are crackpot for discussing how the government could lie to you. It's the other crazy ideas that give you that title.

How did you manage to connect it to the telly without instructions?

It is a shame Pap that when you have some decent points to make (as you do here for example) it is difficult to take you seriously due to the bizarre conspiracies you chose to entertain regarding 9/11 and the recent London attack.

Over on POL he sounds like a right gimp the way he has handled tarmacgate and the debt affair.

It's worse than I had imagined.

How does it go?

My TV does it automatically. It could be the graphics card on the laptop as well.

No one was being abusive, they just thought you were talking rubbish and find it weird that you can't tell the difference between only being interested in saints games and sky sports. If I mostly want to watch saints games with a few others thrown in (which is exactly what I want) then for the price Al jazeera can't be beaten. I'm presuming as this is a saints forum that this is what people want so sky sports is pretty irrelevant to this discussion.

Are you a sky employee? You sound like that bloke who was promoting his pub last week.