egg

Cheers, I hadn't seen that. I'd imagine he's on garden leave pending the conclusion of any disciplinary process/FA process.

How do you reckon that'll sit with a) sponsors and b) players? I'd be staggered if he still has the support of the dressing room.

This isn't a criminal court. It's a tribunal/arbitration, and the panels role was to consider what both sides sought. We sought a fine...that's like trying to rob a bank and asking for a conditional discharge... ridiculous approval from the club.

That's bollocks. The panel had to punish us, and it had to be a sporting sanction. You don't try to sort the opposition team and tactics in breach of the rules and avoid a sporting sanction. Not even in saintsweb land. I'm still waiting for someone to give one credible, just one, sporting sanction. I can't think of anything other than points in this league and an EFL cup ban BUT the club didn't seek that. They pressed for a fine which was, being blunt, absolutely fucking deluded of them. Given the choice between our suggestion of a fine, and the expulsion, it was only going one way.

Yep...and the club offered up no credible sanction for the EFL to hit us with...give them the option of expulsion or a fine was inviting expulsion. We had to have a sporting sanction for a sporting offence like that, and the reality is that points wouldn't have hit us, and having not attempted to steer the panel towards something else (EFL cup ban, for example) i can't see that else they could do. It seems like we payed a game of chicken with them, and lost badly.

I spoke with a prominent ex player in the week. He thinks the lads will feel that way, and won't want to play for him.

Parsons opening his mouth was stupid, but the evidence may have meant we were screwed anyway. Who knows. I'd like to know whether Tonda has lost the dressing room, but regardless, his position is untenable for me.

These theories are utterly pointless. We sent a bloke up there to watch them train. That's it.

We ain't in a position to make any demands. They hold the cards here...and the gun.

The EFL could / should make it clear that a line has been drawn under all our 25/26 spying activities, and that the league and it's members now need to move forwards.

I see the Tonda thing differently. Us not ditching him took away a wee bit of mitigation, and keeping him won't help with some sponsors. He's staring down the barrel of a ban, and that'll only get worse for him if he's done more. Sure, he knows where the skeletons are buried, but his problem is that he ordered the killing.

Agreed. Boro threw the kitchen sink at this. There's undoubtedly been more though, and what's unclear is whether the EFL asked us whether there was more. If they did, and we denied there was, but more comes it, it'll get messy.

Without doubt. Those offences were the first in time so I'd imagine were treated as something akin to "previous convictions". That, plus our dishonesty, daft suggestion of a fine alone as an appropriate penalty (I'd have offered up an EFL cup ban, plus points), the significance of the play offs, pushed us over the edge.

They wouldn't be daft enough to ditch it now, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it go in time. You can't stop the practice , for example, drones flying over head. You have no way of telling who's controlling them, even if it comes down.

The panel made a rod for their own backs by giving points for the other 2 games. It gives an incentive for Boro and other clubs to go investigate, and was completely unnecessary - the expulsion was a massive penalty, and if they'd said that there was no additional penalty for the other games as the expulsion serves as a penalty for all offences, that would have put it to bed.