egg

Donny says Cuba must make a deal. Anyone got a clue what a deal is supposed to relate to? Oil? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2kv2gn62vo

Billy Bob Thornton is immense in everything he does. Even the pissed up thieving Bad Santa.

I'm not persuaded by distraction, although it's a cherry on top for Donny I suppose. It's more complex than that. This is - Venezuela and next Iran - about controlling who does and doesn't get oil (China), who gets oil money and impacting on their stability, and - Venezuela, Greenland - imperialism.

Yep. Even their plain classic shirts have splashes of colour and/or smarty coloured buttons. All a bit Tyson Fury for me.

Amen to those, particularly Oldman. Utterly believable. I'll add Christopher Waltz in Inglorious Basterds. Absolutely nailed the Hans Lander role.

Javier Bardem in no country for old men was unbelievably good. Ditto Kathy Bates in Misery. In lesser known stuff, Stephen Graham in The Virtues was phenomenal.

Prick. Tariff increases if they don't do as they're told?

Warped minds think alike!

Absolutely. With Wellington LCB, Robinson LWB, and Quarshie up top with Archer. Dream team.

Clash

I don't buy anywhere near as much stuff as I did, but spend more on vinyl records than I should. Where we do spend is holidays and breaks. We go away most weekends from spring to the end of summer, and several times in between. We eat out a fair bit as well, but usually just for an Indian, but it's easy to spend almost £100 for 2 just having a ruby. Like Duck, I hate clothes shops, and grab stuff online. Nowt extravagant. M&S, Crew, John Lewis, Aubin, are all decent quality and look good. I have to wear decent shoes though - DM's aren't what they were, but Solovair (who made DM's in England) are exceptional quality, and their NPS stuff isn't far off Church's quality for much less money.

Would he? People said that about Romeu. Is he more mobile than what we have? More incisive in his passing? More creative? He'd certainly bring experience, but I'm not convinced that he brings enough to improve us and make any meaningful difference.

No disrespect, but that's pretty pathetic. If you have an opinion, at least be willing to explain it.

I'm asking for an explanation for your emoji response, not for you to try to convince me. I say she wasn't reckless because she pulled away at low speed, and it should have been obvious to the agent that she may do so as she was behind the wheel of a car with it's engine running. What's the explanation for her being reckless? Emojis, or I wasn't there, aren't a sensible response.

Point me to her recklessness please. Naive, misguided, perhaps, but she wasn't reckless. The agent who killed her when he wasn't a danger to her, was reckless.