egg

I'm not sure what you think we're doing, or what we can do. You (and others) talk as though we've built a sea creating an open path to our door, that we've sent people to northern France, handing out leaflets proclaiming the milk and honey available in the hotels of Hastings and Blackpool, and left dinghies behind so that people can flock here and enjoy all that's on offer. Nobody, I mean nobody, is stopping people wanting to leave certain countries, stopping people making money by popping them in a boat, and sending them into open waters. Like it or not, this will happen. All we can do is make ourselves less attractive a destination, accommodate anyone seeking asylum as cheaply as possible, and process them as quickly as we can. It would be a more productive discussion if the people whining about this issue could offer any thought through thoughts on the solution, rather than the "make the lefties who want them here pay extra" and "it's all Starmer's fault" bollox that people write.

Absolutely. The sad thing is that people read disingenuous nonsense like that and assume that something unusual / wrong has been done. Politics is fecked.

Yep, get the balls in, and Kane will burri-tos his chances.

Nah, Kane will tacos his chances so we'll be fine.

The airport.

That even looked quick in slow motion.

That was a special finish.

And to start of the Rice at RB experiment?

I told you Gordon was the answer, and that Kane should stay on. Or something.

Chalobah, Henderson, Burn.

I've always assumed that she is.

Yep. We looked much better last game with Bellingham in their and playing box to box. If he'd bothered to bring another 10 (Foden, Palmer, Gibbs-White), he would have had that option.

When Gordon is the answer, christ knows what the question is.

Yep. Keeps dropping off. We need a CF who'll stretch their defence and pull their CB's out of shape to create space.

Puncheon would have offered more than this bloke.