egg

Breaking the rules is a tad different to being a dishonest benefit thief mate. Personally, I'd have no time for a friend who did that, but each to their own.

There'll always be benefit thieves, but for every person feigning MH there's someone complaining about migraines or an iffy back etc. The point remains that many people have no idea about MH. Moreover, it's people like you're wife's dodgy mate that are the problem, not genuinely unwell people, or a system that looks after those genuine folk. I'm alao glad my missus keeps honest company. Not sure how I'd feel if she mingled with dishonest thieves.

Your point? What's unclear is whether she's unwell, a cheat, or just that your missus keeps dubious company.

I haven't read his response, but many people have zero idea about MH. They confuse feeling low/sad, worried with depression and anxiety which are altogether different things. Many people have MH issues which mean that they cannot work, so just saying that doing so would solve their problem shows an ignorance. Then there's the more acute MH issues which would prejudice others if unwell people were around them in the work place. The lack of understanding around this issue boils my piss.

Apologies Farmer. I've put him back on ignore.

Agreed. He's better with his back to goal than with the ball at his feet. I'd like to think we'll upgrade him, but if he's our number 2, we may as play him.

BBD through the middle isn't as bad as BBD out wide. I'd like to see how he does playing there after a Tonda pre season.

Clueless.

Thanks for that. So trying to compare an apple to an orchard. Still shows poor judgement, at best, though.

No idea mate, I'm just trying to think of a logical reason for the ridiculous delay. If they're proceeding based on the same incidents as the EFL, it should be quick and easy. All a bit odd.

There's a paywall... headline doesn't look great though!

The punishment was a package, so any appeal would address all issues together. The timing point is being made out as an issue that it isn't. As the appellant, you want an urgent appeal, not a delay - you want a wrong rectified without delay. Same day or short delay appeals are common. There shouldn't be a need to spend ages preparing for an appeal of that sort. Our case was that the panel got it wrong based on the evidence, the rules and any precedent. Any credible legal team should know how they say the panel got it wrong, and be able to take that into an urgent appeal.

I'm not sure all the facts were known. We admitted three specific episodes, and the tribunal made certain findings. Whether the FA are investigating whether Tonda did anything else, we don't know, but that's the only reason I can think of for the prolonged delay.

Prick is my go to. Fine word.

I think any immigration assesment should include knowledge of UK derogatory terms. Essential for integration.