egg

If you're talking revolutionary tech, that's different to revolutionising space for travel, which they haven't revolutionised.

He said they had "revolutionised space travel". They've done no such thing. When spave travel becomes safe and a regular thing beyond a select few, I'd agree it's been revolutionised, but until then, let's keep some perspective.

I'm not sure which way you mean that...if you think it's revolutionised space travel, I'd like to know where I can sign up for my trip to the international space station. I'm free on Thursday.

Yep. Space X isn't a great example of a success story, yet. In time I think it'll be worth a fortune, but it's not done anything to date to warrant praise, and the suggestion that it's revolutionised space travel is nonsense. NASA on the other hand, has actually had successes.

Capatilsm is a tool for organising markets, not how to organise a society. Governments deal with the latter.

I'm not sure anyone was ever going to invade, save the US for the mining prospects. The Greenlanders will recognise that, but I suspect will be relieved there's been a compromise which hopefully doesn't impact their day to days lives.

So what sectors are you referring to? Which sectors have you had direct dealings with, and what level? What are the actual issues you've experienced?

You cannot make such a sweeping statement. You plainly have zero idea about the reality on the ground. I only have direct knowledge of the court system, and that has been chronically under funded and staffed for years. Pay more money, and they'd have even less staff and even more backlog and chaos. The staff, on the whole, are superb, and the issue is not too many people or poor talent. You'd do well to understand the reality rather than making sweeping comments.

I think you're expecting a bit much. That's a bloody good bench for this level.

The squad includes the options we've had all season, and we've scored 18 goals. Relax poppet.

I know several ex players who are. Incredibly popular bloke.

As I said, you'll go around in circles. I know the difference outlooks we have, and as much as I don't respect your political views, I respect that you can have them. I'll leave it there.

I'm not going here with you given your Israel/Gaza stance mate.

I won't carry on a discussion with you because you'll go round in circles, but I'll comment re lineker. He's a bloke with a moral compass. His opinion about Zionism isn't a complicated one, and anyone can and should have an opinion on that. What he had was the bollocks to voice it, unlike most. I'm not sure how you can conflate that with his stance on his tax - where he challenged a wrongly applied principle - and was proved correct. I see him as standing up for what's right, whereas you applaud people who stand up up for what's right for their pocket.

I have no respect whatsoever for any person who abandons their country for selfish ends. Lineker I respect immensely. He's got a moral compass and a pair of bollocks.