S-Clarke

On Comms Blackmore suggested he was in the building and should be announced at the weekend, but probably Monday at this point so we can keep a deadline day arrival up our sleeve.

Window shuts on 7pm on Monday. We'll bring in a full back, and dependant on some attacking options leaving, we'll grab a winger too. I cannot see us adding a GK, CB, CM or ST. Think we've sorted those areas, well the club think so.

Yep I heard that same thing, they certainly don't have a clue about football.

Is it a case that as a fan base we've been conditioned to expect a fixed philosophy? I don't think Still brings a specific philosophy to the table that you can ring fence, I think he'll just bring a standard, common sense approach to football games and our style will alter for whoever we face, once we have the full squad. I don't think he's wedded to a philosophy as such, so I'm not sure we'll ever see any specific characteristics to take away, as you saw with Martin's pass, pass, pass, pass. Once we gets bedded in I'm just hoping the 'better' players being played in their best positions just win us games. No clever bollocks.

They've got a few Aussies in their squad who will be away, and some South African's. No idea who they are.

Leicester have been credited with an approach from some of their ITK's, and their journos aren't denying the chance of him moving. One to watch. Why Leicester would want him is beyond me though.

Not the same GK coach either. Dean Thornton, Andrew Sparkes and now Ruben - all different coaching setups, different types of GK coach, different mangers...same frigging decision to pick this guy. What do the performance analysts do when they highlight the goals we let in? It's impossible not to think that his inclusion is a club strategy and the coaching staff have no say in the selection.

Blackstock CDAJFU.

It's a shame the fans views went 360 on this guy so quickly, but he made his bed by having his little spat during January. In our worst ever season, he downed tools and wanted out. Yeah, cheers.

Even if the club are too proud to give up on the Bazunu project, the very least they should have done is brought in a GK to challenge him and make him look over his shoulder - someone the fans would be confident in coming in. We don't have that, Bazunu has no pressure and thus the theme will continue. We had a blind spot at RB for years before KWP, but a blind spot at GK is catastrophic.

And they've already got half our points before September. It took us until boxing day to get 6 points. I don't think we'll ever see a team as bad as us at that level again.

Thought they'd drew, what a sucker. I guess this means Man Utd are the greatest again.

I don't think we had any CM's to put on the bench. Matsuki was the closest. Sessy was with the U21's yesterday so wouldn't have travelled.

Compare him to Mads on the other side and it's light and day. Mads always knows where to be, what touch to take, when to pass, when not to pass. Manning does run around like an out of control Jack Russell at times, which is why he's often out of position. Cannot say the same for Mads - so we need a similar signing for LB please.

I don't rate Stephens, I think he's shit. THB is good, he gets a bad rep because of the teams he's played in - but he's the sort you build around. I like Edwards as well personally, so did QPR. There are another CB's at this club to get a tune out of, I wouldn't worry about that area - it's what's behind them.

This is the normal Bazunu argument, it's the same thing. They're not howlers, he doesn't drop howlers. He just lets in goals, all the time, every week, which make you think ''could he have done better there?''. Maybe, maybe not. But given that we ask the same questions every week, I'd say a good % of the goals he lets in should be saved by a competent GK. I'm not going to micro-analyse the goals today, apart from say that he looked like a midget in the goal when that free kick was taken - he had no leap because he had too far to travel to that site of the goal. He's going go down in the ages as a GK who doesn't make howlers, but also doesn't really make any notable saves.

Not sure why you'd think about a CB. We have 5 of them, 6 as Charles can also play there. The CB's are fine, I don't have a problem with those. You can get promoted with those CB's. The GK is a problem, I'll give you that. But we've already brought our GK in and sadly the club felt we just needed a third choice. This will likely be looked back on as a catastrophic error in May, but that's the project the club have gone all in with - for some reason.

Come on mate, you've had it in for him since day one and it's odd. A little chink and you've jumped on it, repeated it every week. He's made it clear why he's going 5 at the back, repeatedly. It will change once we have proper wide players in the building which we now do, and will have after Monday. There is lots of work to do. This is/was one of the worst ever PL sides to grace the planet, it's going to take some work to re-mould us and it needs time. This was never a ready-made win every week from the start role.

I thought the first half was pretty controlled, we didn't give up too much and I felt we knew what we were doing. Archer was a thorn in their side pulling them around, making runs in behind etc. Watford did always carry a threat with their physical profile though. 2nd half was trash heap. We couldn't keep the ball, we surendered the entire game really. I thought we'd got out of jail with that free kick, but based on the 2nd half a draw was fair for Watford. I thought we were too loose on the ball in the 2nd half, playing passes into spaces where no one was, poor touch and control from players, being broken at from our corners. It was all pretty trash heap stuff. Hopefully after the international break we can start bedding in some of the new guys, we're still not far off anything really. So early for people to be panicking about the position we are sat etc, the table means zilch right now. But we've got go control games better than we do.

Edwards isn't starting though, the change for Downes was to bring Robinson on. So can only assume it means Azaz moves back centrally alongside Charles, with Robinson and Fraser either side of Archer.

Yeah, midfield glaringly light. I imagine Azaz will move back, but it does seem horrendously light sadly. Not much we can do about it.

Downes withdrawn from the 11 due to illness, Robinson comes in.

But he was named in the original 11, so he must have travelled?

He is starting.

And then Chelsea score in the 9th min of added time, which was only added due to the time it took to chalk off Fulhams goal. It's those sort of things which make the PL pointless. You might as well not even bother to compete.