S-Clarke

Should be a good game. I expect it to be pretty open, I can't really see Wednesday coming and parking the bus tbh - they seem incapable of that this season. There will be goals - but if we're as solid and organised as we have been recently, then we'll have no problems what so ever.

If you can find me that quote, feel free. It seems as if you have alot of time on your hands so off you go.

Are you being serious? Because if you are you need to get out more. Actually I'd say some of the comments in this thread matches our fanbase this season. Seriously deluded.

lol @ people moaning about the new sponsor, saying it's underwhelming. Seriously, get a grip. It's a club sponsor. ''We signed forte instead of Mackail-Smith FFS!" ''We got Adkins instead of MoN ffs!!!'' ''FFS!!!! Who the hell is this sponsoring us? They're not a massive brand FFS"

Let's hope this doesn't end up one of those 6/7 page threads about someone who never actually signs. I've lost count of the amount of threads we've had like this in the last year!!

Holy ****...

And the last day fixtures are as irritating. Saturday, 7 May 2011 Bournemouth v Rochdale, 15:00 Huddersfield v Brentford, 15:00 Peterborough v Dag & Red, 15:00 Southampton v Walsall, 15:00 We have to be 2nd going into the last day, otherwise it's playoffs for sure.

No wembley trip unfort. Playoffs are at Old Trafford

I very much doubt it.

Let's not be too down ffs. It's not like we've lost.....they will not win every single remaining game.

90+3 mins ffs!!!!!

Oh no ffs what a **** night.

Wednesday 1 - 3 Posh

FFS , how **** are Wednesday? 3-0 now. I bet they'll miraculously turn into an amazing side against us on Saturday..!

He's been gone for a long time!

bloody Mackail-Smith

I've seen him play for both Sheffield United and S****horpe, and he scored goals in the level above. He's a good squad player for us at the moment

He seems a decent pro - so I can't see him handing in a transfer request or anything, so I'm sure he'll see out the season there, score 30+ goals and then move on in the summer. Hopefully to us!

Agree with you on that DD. Thats why I feel sorry for Forte and N'Guessun, they're good players in their own right but they'll be given little chance here (as we're seeing) because they cost a pittance and aren't Macakil-Smith/Austin etc...

Good thread title..(!) Good signing for Huddersfield, replacement for Pilks really. He wouldn't get into our team in the place of Lallana or Chambo.

Hammond is a good player and is in a good run of form at the moment. I've always liked what he offers, he can look limited at times but I think he always gives his all. We don't need cover for Chambo and Lallana, that's just being greedy tbh. We have N'Guessun and Forte who have not had a chance to make an impact yet, they can play on the flanks (either side) or up front. I don't understand why they're being written off with less than 120mins to their names.

9 points out of a possible 9. Bournemouth - haven't been beaten at home since the start of December, and we won 3-1 there. Colchester - hadn't been beaten at home since November, and we go there and win 2-0. Yeovil - not a great game, but 3 points , 3 goals and job done. All that's needed at this stage of the season. But those 2 away results are stand out for me - terrific results.

You are making yourself look very silly on here saint lard. It's like you're desperate for him to do badly so you can say ''I told you so'' - but you're bringing up totally ridiculous reasons as to why he's ''rubbish'' and apparently promotion form since Adkins has been ''in the building'' isn't good enough. Just accept that you've been proven wrong before you embarrass yourself even further - he's a good manager.

Agreed, although we all have pretty tricky run-ins. P'Boro def. have the hardest though, which is good news based on their current form.

Results wise we have, maybe not in terms of performances - but who performs 100% every game over the course of a season? Results wise we're up their with Brighton, unfortunately our start hampered us - which isn't anything to do with Adkins and co.