1976_Child

Pards being given the boot was the best thing to happen. No disrespect to the man, he served us well while here but we have NA now and his team, who let's face it are the dog's nuts.

not from me. sorry. looking forward to it for too long no way I can be charitable on this occasion.

I haven't been following the Liam Fox case closely. Is he gay, is Werrity his lover or just a mate?

Quite right. Even if the papers he chucked away turn out to be harmless he is a complete tit for doing it. Should be sacked.

I think if you read my posts carefully you will understand that I agree with you whole-heartedly. They are all champagne socialists. The day the Labour party picked Milli-dweeb for leader was the lowest point in its illustrious history. Actually, second lowest: Nothing was as damaging for the party than Blair.

does Al Fayed still own Fulham? I know he sold Harrods. Just wondering what financial state Fulham are in.

Do the academy players get to watch home games at SMS for free? Are they encouraged to and if so do they have reserved seating? Anyone know? (and if they do get to come for free, do they have to pay to lock their bikes up outside the stadium..?)

Don't think so. I think he went to Fettes in Edinburgh.

Of course I am not talking about Tory voters. I am specifically talking about the pillocks who are running the country. The typical Tory-boy MP has absolutely no idea about how the vast majority of the country lives. They have done nothing before entering politics (which can also be said about many new Labour MPs) and they definitely have no sympathy for 'the masses'. They see it as their God-given right to lecture people on how to live, they take away precious money from the people at the bottom of the pile. They think that an Eton education makes them fit to rule and that the plebs should do what they are told. Their main concern is protecting the Establishment so that their children will be able to waltz into a well-paid job but damn the common man's children. They don't matter. I feel sorry for you, genuinely, if you are struggling to get by. But you should think long and hard before voting for the Tories in future. They honestly couldn't give a stuff about you or your phone bill. But I do concede that it would be easier to convince people of this if we had a real Labour party.

Speak for yer self. I was giving it top volume. Thought we did well actually.

Can't all afford to travel in style. Anyway, there is nothing wrong with the travel coaches. Been on many and there is always a good atmosphere. Unless someone uses the on-board crapper and stinks the whole coach out.

So you reckon Cameron and Osborne really understand what it is like to scrape by on minimum wage, no savings and no hope if the job is lost? Gimme a break. The Tories have never cared about poor people. And they never will. All these toffee-nosed nobs went into politics for is to make it easier for them and their privileged 'old school tie' network to make more money and consolidate power. And the tragedy is that we don't have a real Labour party to oppose them. Mili-dweeb is just as feckless and useless.

The only unemployed youths that I want to see are the legions of feckless Tory mummy's boys 'running' the country at the moment. Typical rich over privileged ***ts who were all born with silver spoons in their mouths and Daddy's trust fund so they never have to do a single day of real work. Cameron and Osborne wouldn't know what unemployment is let alone care. Sameold elites lording it over the rest of us. The sooner the coalition breaks down the better.

...Which of you Benson & Hedges is going to Derby? I bet Dune is too busy attending some far-right rally or sucking on a Thatcher poster to care, Ohio Saint is too busy pretending to be American and secretly wishing he was an ear of maize, Dubai Phil is waaay too busy counting the cash he earns whilst eating sand, and Trousers is tied up being pants... .... but apart from them, which of you is going to Derby?

+10. Tesco is just sh!te. Sort of place Dune would never dare step foot in lest he pick up inferior poor-persons DNA off the handles of the baskets.

Well, why am I not surprised. You are a right-winger Tory-boy. Never mind that Lidl offers quality to 'the masses' (those pesky people you Tories hate). Is Waitrose the only one for you Dune? Only shop with your own privileged set? Can't stand poor people? Just like all Tories, only care about themselves. And you probably have a nasty anti-foreigner thing going on too, given that Lidl is German. Shame on you.

So just because you can't go means that you absolutely can not ever tout that ticket? Weird non-logic there.

No, my reply was not 'a warning to others'. it was merely to remind people that touting is illegal. But thank you for your moronic input on this subject.

I come out with rubbish? That's rich coming from you!!!! ROFL!! I was making a point to dissuade others from thinking touting is acceptable.

I hope you are only asking face value and not a mark up.

well, you are a right-wing fascist Thatcherite Tory-boy so no real surprise that you hate charity

don't be silly. You were obviously not aware of the legal definition of rape. The fact that I failed to include 'the mouth' too is irrelevant. It is clear that you assumed, prior to my educating you, that rape was any kind of sexual attack. And when I pointed out to you that you were wrong you are now sulking. And no, I didn't need to look it up on Google or wikipedia. I know these things. I merely provided you with a conclusive source so that you could bring yourself up to speed with the legal position. It really does pay to know what you are talking about before making a sweeping statement in such a way that you did.

The club should play 'the wheels on the bus go round and round...' after we score.

Sorry, I believe I am actually correct. "The Sexual Offences Act 2003 (the Act) came into force on the 1 May 2004. It repealed almost all of the existing statute law in relation to sexual offences. The purpose of the Act is to strengthen and modernise the law on sexual offences, whilst improving preventative measures and the protection of individuals from sexual offenders. Under section 1(1) SOA 2003 a defendant, A, is guilty of rape if: _ A intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of B (the complainant) with his penis; _ B does not consent to the penetration; and, _ A does not reasonably believe that B consents." source: http://www.rapecrisis.org.uk/Definitionofrape2.php And it has to be penetration by a penis. So woman can not ever commit 'rape'. Unless they have a penis. Which they don't. But a woman can be convicted of the crime of 'rape' if she willingly helped a man do the act of penetration, such as if she held down the victim. And if a man jumps a woman and shoves a banana up her vagina then it is not rape, it would be 'assault by penetration'. Rape is ONLY penetration with a penis of the vagina, anus or mouth.

At school a very well meaning friend said "If I had all the money in the world I would give it to the poor."