1976_Child

Well something like it would be good, but never like more than one club having the same song. Gets me right steamed up when I hear spurs sing "when the spurs go marching in". Bloody plagiarizers.

Whose the geezer in the black top?

Agree. That was a classic. Let's hope no one tries any thing similar with NC. Personally, I hope we all sing "Nigel Adkins Red Stripe Army" as loud as possible on Saturday. Give him a really good vocal welcome.

Not too sure about that one. Too complicated for the Yoof to get there microbial brains around. And it hasn't got anything about shooting pompey in it so will be a non-starter in the back rows of the Northam. What we need is something that old farts in the Itchen center and families in the Chapel can sing without associating themselves with the Northam Numpties.

Get off, Baj. Go back and read what I have said. The outcome of 9/11 was that it affected MILLIONS of folk in the Middle East. Not just comfy ex-pats like dubai-phil and his children's IB courses, all of whom had the luxury of 'panicky American lawyers' and contact at the Irish Government to get them out of harm's way before the might of the Empire was unleashed on the people of Iraq. My heart goes out to you dubai-phil, really. Sorry you had the luxury of caring about your kids' education whilst others in the Middle East were scraping their kids' body parts off the road after someone 20,000 feet above them dropped a bomb on their school. Sorry you had the inconvenience of those bloody lawyers trying to get you back to safety. No really, I feel for you. Must have been tough. Over 1,000,000 people in Iraq and Afghanistan have been killed - some might say, murdered - by America and Britain in response to 9/11. And you want me to give more of a sh!t about an ex-pat who is no doubt out there earning many, many, many times more than the local wage and who has undoubtedly consciously made the choice to go work there because of such lucrative rewards, over the people of Iraq who were 100% completely innocent of the 9/11 attacks, but whom, none the less were slaughtered in their sleep to assuage the Revenge of the West? Get off.

That is quite precious! Are you drunk, maybe? 'Memories' you say? Ha! Ha! Memories about an event which had no direct impact on your life! How sad. Just like the millions of shallow idiots who 'mourned' Diana's death as though it meant something to them. People who try too hard to 'care' about something which has nothing to do with them are, frankly, sad. 9/11 - awful. Not good. But not a frickin soap opera cry-fest to give you sad souls something to 'care' about. Leave it alone. Get a life of your own, don't hijack others' grief.

I have to pay my council tax bill. So no. We'll only lose anyway. New manager or no, I quite like my rubbish being collected. Of course, if I was a professional footballer, even in this league, I would earn several thousand pounds a week for turning in a crap half-arsed performance but still would not need to worry about paying the council tax.

yeah, good come back. Like it. Or just maybe I have a very different opinion to you. Sorry for thinking different to you. Sorry for not swallowing the given line about 'those nasty terrorists'. I must just be 13 years old. Pathetic really, that most people are so completely brainwashed that they can't think outside the barriers that they find themselves in. So here is a nice easy one for you: What makes it wrong for a bunch of disaffected Moslems to hijack commercial airplanes and fly them into tall buildings but makes it perfectly right - and indeed a cause of celebration! - for a committee of generals to target civilian areas with stealth bombers knowing - yes, knowing! - that there will be 'collateral damage', to achieve their military aims. This 'collateral damage' was women, children and non-combatants. But yet 'our side' killed them anyway. So, perhaps before you get on your high horse, dear Um Bungo, and resort to infantile put downs you might ponder a minute upon the moral question I have just outlined. What exactly gives us the right to kill 1,000,000 innocent civilians? Go on, have a stab at answering that.

or why not simply refrain from getting all tearful over a date which most likely didn't affect anyone posting here one iota even 9 years ago, let alone today. All this blubbering about how 'where you were at the time' and 'how you felt'. Puke-worthy soap-opera shallow bullsh!t. Chances are 9/11 didn't impact the life of anybody who reads this forum. But in the name of 'the War on Terror' over 1,000,000 innocent people have been slaughtered by America, Britain and et al. Not to mention the hundreds of British service men and thousands of US soldiers killed. For what? And nothing, not even an insincere crocodile tear for them? Just so long as we can all wallow in our pious self back-slapping about 'remembering' where we were on 'that fateful day'. Pass the ****ing bucket, I need to throw up.

i'm sure they are very grateful for your thoughts. Meanwhile 500,000+ families in Iraq and countless in Afghanistan are not in our puke-worthy thoughts. Up the US Empire! 3,000 die in nasty terrorist atrocity = very bad. Must weep many tears and hold annual puke-a-thon. 1,000,000+ innocent Iraqis and Afghans are slaughtered at the hands of the Empire, its allies and depleted uranium shells and no one gives a flying ****. Yeah, whoopee doo. That's the power of democracy and CNN. Not in my name, thank you.

I remember it. Thing is, it was 9 years ago and two US imperial wars later. Maybe time for a bit of closure, just build another frickin' building on the site and move on. Sure, there is still pain, but do we need to hear it every year? The tiresome list of names being read out? Come on America, move on.

don't have a TV so wouldn't know. what is HD anyway?

wobble

yes. I am.

I agree. Real desire is missing. 'Journeyman' is a term we have not used to describe the lads since the latter half of Burley's reign. But it is looking more and more likely that we will need to dust of that title if the lack of desire persists.

Turkish, me olde mucker, you is not 'alf wrong. I've said it before, and will say it again: a team is not about personalities. A team is a team. Some one needs to come in and spank them all into shape. Seriously, get them all into the locker room, shorts and jockstraps down, bend over and a good hard thrashing. They can do better. They know they can do better. But they are slipping into 'journeyman' territory. Nothing a good, hard spanking couldn't sort out though.

sure, but he ain't yet ours....

luv u 2 !!

So once again: bluuuuufuuufuuuufuufuuufffufufufufufufufufufufffff f!

bluuuuufuuufuuuufuufuuufffufufufufufufufufufuffffff! that was my rectum farting..

yes, he did get the push by the old regime, but if we had kept him - or had him now - we would not be languishing in the turd-scrape of the third division. Pearson is the ideal manager for us right now. Here's hoping Adkins will/might/could be as good as Pearson, to be so he needs to be a real Sgt. Major and bust a few balls. We have a good squad but they need whipping into shape. And we need Antonio/Papa/Similar as well. Not enough pace, not enough grit in the changing room, not enough desire. Our next boss needs to come in and spank them into shape. bare bottoms if necessary.

he ain't coming our way. go take yer pills and have a lie down.

and what is that, exactly?

exactly. enough said.