Jump to content

shurlock

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    20,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by shurlock

  1. Gao gao, wherever you maybe Grassing on mates in the PRC And we don't care If they get the death penalty Coz we are the famous Southampton FC
  2. #fppschtick
  3. 75 billion Chinese people?
  4. Perhaps KL needs the cash- that's in her interest, though not necessarily ours.
  5. The former.
  6. Can't say I'm particularly pleased.
  7. The guardian article is rehashing and putting its own emphasis on an article written by Hammond and Fox for the Telegraph. If you want to see what was written -from the horse's mouth so to speak- I suggest you consult that. Again nobody has explained how you can have both a smooth transition while outside the SM and CU starting in 2019. The only possibility is that the UK engineers bespoke arrangements that mirror or function like the SM and CU. They, however, will come at a price which the government, again, refuses to acknowledge or come clean about.
  8. Jack 'Casillas' Rose?
  9. Because the UK still wants a transitional arrangement. Hard to imagine anything but a cliff edge if the UK is outside both the SM and CU (per the original Telegraph article). Yet more meaningless contradictions.
  10. So the UK will leave the single market and customs union in March 2019? But there will be a transition period, a period during which ostensibly the UK remains in all but name in the single market and customs union? That clears things up - the government still utterly deluded in thinking it can pick and choose what it likes and leave the unappetising bits. All these scenarios are ultimately within the gift of the EU. In other news, Fox's bestest fwend, Adam Werrity has been motoring ahead with Brexit-themed advent calendar and seeking funding from wealthy kippers. I guess Trident hasn't got the call yet. #tradingpowerhouse
  11. Remind me who ploughed a car into a bunch of people, killing one and critically injuring others? You're doing yourself no favours.
  12. If all else fails, resort to craven whataboutery. Who mentioned or defended Corbyn?
  13. You mean the anonymous White House clarification that came 24hrs later after a torrent of criticism, including from allies pal? I guess the significance of the original statement is only lost on you then. It certainly wasn't lost on those American white supremacists who celebrated its refusal to outright mention them. I mean why shouldn't Trump couch his language in vague political platitudes - it's not like he spent the election campaign bashing Democrats for kid gloves around not naming 'radical Islamic terrorism'.
  14. Is either going to get on the subs bench in the league anytime soon?
  15. No. Try again. We're discussing events in Charlottesville which you seem unable to call out for what they are. Instead you're confused why Trump is under attack for his wilful vagueness -never mind other Republicans, many of whom are not shrinking violets, are quite explicit about things. The only ones who find the criticism similarly odd are the likes of Richard Spencer. Nice company.
  16. Same applies to hypo in this case.
  17. Which accounts are those? Remind me who drove the vehicle into the crowd, mirroring the sick methods of Islamist terror over here?
  18. Not on BT Sports. We got the Stevie G show and the story how he convinced Suarez not to go to Arsenal. All the pundits also agreeing that it was not appropriate for Countinho to push for a move after only a signing a new contract in January. Guess different rules apply in VVD's case...
  19. Agree we pressed alot more, though Swansea played right into our hards by trying to build from the back each and every time. Alot of our pressure came from forcing errors so high up the pitch. We got alot of crosses in - it became less effective as the game went on. Bertrand was probably our most dangerous player in the first half. We went away from him in the second half, perhaps because the amount of work he was doing was unsustainable.
  20. Yesterday was a much better overall performance than Watford: last season we hardly got going in the first half. It was a disjointed mess. Only in the second half, did we begin to impose ourselves, esp after Hojbjerg came on.
  21. Agree, though Swansea were abysmal.
  22. Christ you talk some crap - what did Yoshida do wrong? He won virtually everything, distribution was sharp. He missed a v.good header and was turned once but that was it. His other chances were decent efforts.
  23. Richard Hall had more potential in his little toe.
  24. MLT mugging him in front of the kop is still a highlight of mine - remember Hansen on MOTD that night trying to downplay the goals (didn't he also score a free kick?) and MLT's value and contribution.
×
×
  • Create New...