Jump to content

Verbal

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    7,031
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Verbal

  1. Back to the original question, you have to go back to 1972 for the answer. After Apollo 11, public interest in missions to the moon dropped alarmingly. Only the life-or-death drama of Apollo 13 briefly re-awakened public appetite in America for the Moon program. But after that, it was a bit like a mid-season episode of Big Brother. No one cared. And without public support in the US, there was no chance that it was going to continue - especially at a time when the Vietnam War was still being beamed into people's homes in all its technicolor horror. Meanwhile, NASA was thinking Big Thoughts - the Moon was too piddling. The reason the space shuttle was designed was as a first stage for building a craft in Earth orbit that would take astronauts to Mars. Of course, that didn't really excite public or political opinion either. And budget cuts limited the shuttle to little more than a service vehicle for popping up into earth orbit every now and again. To make things worse, a year after the last man stepped on the Moon, the oil crisis hit, and Western economies took a swallow dive. The technology that got men to the Moon was in many ways frighteningly crude, in others brilliantly inventive. It could be much more easily achieved today, but it would still be costly. Perhaps if Osama hadn't decied to fly those planes into the Twin Towers, we might have been back by now.
  2. 11>10=√f.all
  3. The libel court case is going to be funny, at least.
  4. Rubbish. I think he's an excellent manager and P*mpey would be lucky to have him.
  5. Why don't we have a Saintsforum England Under 19s - we pick the REAL young talents in the game, forget the pros. The only problem I cna see is finding a Hampshire League ground small enough to contain the genius of our selection.
  6. Inversions of syllables and word conflations are common among children as part of the hugely complex process of language acquisition. Most children quickly put things the right way around after practice, although some have been known to go into a fearful regression whereby they place dots throughout their sentences.
  7. Can't argue with that.
  8. Wow, the north London yobbos really pulled a fast one on dear old Rupes.
  9. Ooh, a field day. I loves those. Tell me when and where.
  10. If this the death of the 'special relationship' I'd happily stamp on its grave.
  11. I was talking about match-fixing with my son at the weekend. He's an Arsenal supporter and we'd just watched Almunia make a frankly ridiculous challenge which allowed Rooney to go down for a pen. I'm not saying Almunia was 'fixing' - just that you never know, and that it's likely that quite a few games, especially in the Prem, have been fixed in some way. How many times have you watched a match where the ref has extended injury time until what seems like the 'right' team has scored? And refs are always going to appear to be on one side or the other to respective fans, but how many times does it appear that a ref has 'looked for' a match-changing sending off. Can absurd misses always be just momentary incompetence? And on and on. That's the danger that goes with MLT's admission sadly. It drains confidence from us as fans - we're never absolutely sure whether we've paid to watch a truly competitive game, or whether we're just pawns in a far-eastern betting scam. I'm not saying match-fixing is widespread - I just don't know. But it's a worry, and the MLT doesn't help.
  12. If that's Serie B it looked no better than League 1. Some pretty comical defending and a really nasty, career-ending tackle.
  13. Um pahars? Sorry to hear about the stutter benjii.
  14. When you're right, you're right. Finger on the trigger as always, TDD.
  15. Verbal

    Murty back?

    I think the question of how long he's out is vaguely relevant in some small way. Shouldn't that be known by now - at least as a guess? In any case, the point is, he'll be missed - so sooner he's back the better.
  16. Certainly easier to invade. Submarine access not so good though.
  17. Verbal

    Murty back?

    I somehow summoned the energy to look - but was clearly too lazy to find it says how long he's out. I think a 'FFS' is called for here.
  18. Before the woohoo'ing gets out of hand, where was this find exactly? The UK? Or somewhere pleasant like Yemen? With oil, sadly, price isn't related to the world's available reserves. It's related to things like political stability in Russia and the ludicrous potentates in Saudi, as well as Iraq and Nigeria - or the extent to which any of them are turning the taps on or off.
  19. I assume you mean Ted Nugent, because we have no chance of getting David, Poopyfied as he may be.
  20. Impressed.
  21. Verbal

    Murty back?

    A double positive is a negative. Sorry Alps, I know you tried.
  22. Verbal

    Murty back?

    Why is there no official news on Murty? Or have I missed it?
  23. At least he didn't go for your dots. We are all relieved.
  24. Hasn't Mellis played at full back? I just can't quite see Thomas skipping daintily down the byline and putting over a cross that humans can reach.
  25. I think you're having a Spinal Tap moment there.
×
×
  • Create New...