Verbal

Which of course is the classic anti-Semitic trope. Do you honestly not know that?

A rare example of self-awareness that you accept that Corbynism is a religion. Carry on with the bowing and scraping.

Jesus H Christ. How much lower are you prepared to stoop in defence of your idol? And yet he's now been reported to the NEC for bringing the Labour party into disrepute. Think about that for a second. And he's been caught out not just once but twice in the last ten days. I used to think he wasn't personally a Jew hater. My view now is that he's not a Jew hater in the sense that he doesn't support Brexit.

Jew haters: tolerated. Remainers: sacked.

FFS. "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1."

It's almost as if you're accusing others of trivialising things. What's your position on the most important issue of all - Corbyn's hat?

Well this is obviously disappointing for the jihadist betting wing on here. Looks like buck tooth tim could win. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/22/brexit-britain-norway-theresa-may-transition-deal

To the hive mind that's exactly how it appears. Outside of your Jonestown world, though, Corbyn is the drag anchor of real progress. Still, at least you'll get to celebrate another plucky defeat at the next general election to the most incompetent, horrific Tory government of modern times.

Calling Corbyn an orator is a bit like calling Pellegrino a brilliant manager. He's a dour, rather ill-tempered West-hating, dictator-loving grouch with the charisma of a brick. You've gone beyond the call of duty sticking it out as long as you have as a card-carrying member. If you're not Momentum, you're not only not welcome, you're, in their charming terms, a 'class enemy'. They have the same attitude with the media: Corbyn's inner gang absolutely despise Channel 4 News, the Guardian and the New Statesman, all of whom have been 'banned' from contact with his Jezness, while he's happy to talk to Russia Today, Sky and the Canary/Squawkbox idiocracy. Their venom is reserved especially for the Guardian - the paper that exposed the Panama Papers, the Paradise Papers, brought Snowden's revelations to light, and now Cambridge Analytica. Get out while you still can.

So the Brexit Jihadi backlash is ON. A puddle-worthy trawler full of creatures past their sell-by date - plus some dead fish - rocked the very foundations of the Houses of Parliament. All Remoaners should sit up and take notice. This is going to be easier than we thought.

It used to be said that you couldn't tell the difference between Blair's and Bush's view of the world. Now it's impossible to distinguish Corbyn's and Trump's tepid mollifying of Putin and the criminal gang running his rogue state. http://time.com/5207310/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-arms-race/

You may have got this all wrong Shylock. JJ could be a closet remoaner, celebrating what all the commentators are calling Brexit In Name Only (BINO). The real Jihadists are screaming and hurling faeces - or is that fish? - into the Thames outside Parliament. As mature grown-ups with an intelligent argument are wont to do.

That hole Jezza keeps digging is getting awfully big. Now he's saying it's vital Russia is sent a sample of the nerve agent as soon as possible so that they can say 'categorically' whether it was them or not. You can imagine the conversation in Kremlin Towers: 'Whoopsie, that death chemical really was ours after all! Sorry, Brits!!' I bet May can't believe her luck.

Yes, May scored a cheap political point. She revealed to Corbyn only secret-level information made available to all privy councillors, rather than top-secret information made available to foreign leaders. She did this to lead Corbyn into the most obvious of traps - make the case look less convincing so that he would launch a self-immolating virtue signal about lack of evidence that it was the Russian state and that we should all just get along and talk to one another. It was an act of the lowest politics on May's part; like Brexit, she played an issue of huge national importance for political positioning within her own party. That Corbyn fell for it hook, line and sinker speaks volumes about his hopeless inadequacy as a political leader.

Indeed - very good. But there's surely some mistake. The link says it was made by the BBC, but aren't they just a British version of Russia Today, and therefore incapable of anything like the well researched and well resourced journalism on display here?

While Corbynistas, spoonfed ******** by the Canary and Squawkbox, debate the incredibly important issue of whether Newsnight crushed the blacks on their idol's hat, here's an excellent interview by Newsnight's Emily Maitlis, with some truly alarming implications.

It's just the Corbynista scream teens - a really silly attempt at distraction. If they were even halfway sensible, they'd be defending Corbyn's essentially sensible argument that it probably was the Russian state but that we should wait for the hard and confirmed evidence. Corbyn himself screwed it up by offering other theories - eg the Russian mafia. But his cretinous acolytes have outdone him by 'putting their money' (although that apparently means no money at all) on, to them, the most credible scenario of all, that British intelligence services carried out a chemical warfare attack on its own soil against its own assets and threatening the lives of its own citizens. Classic 'false flag' bull****, swallowed whole by gullible fools.

Link to the chemist... https://twitter.com/deadlyvices/status/974171484787822592

It's sadly part of the Orwellian bull**** deployed by conspiracy theorists that they pretend that by citing other conspiracy theorists they are somehow above the 'sheeple'. Give it up, it'll damage your health. If you think I get my news authoritatively from the Mail and Telegraph then you must be new to this place. Murray, however, is not an 'alternative' news source. Here he is getting his clock cleaned by an actual chemist. If you're serious about 'alternatives' I suggest you read this carefully, because the 'alternative' in this case is an actual chemist, who knows slightly more than your average 'alternative' Joe. Why am I supposed to have a view about Annie Machon. I don't even know who she is. So let's stick to the topic. Here's my tempting offer on the bet. I'll bet you £500 you're wrong about the poisoning being carried by by our own intelligence services. If I'm right you only have to pay me £250. What could be fairer? And what could be a better test of a conspiracy loon's convictions?

I'll take that bet. How much are you proposing? And Craig 'false flag 'straw man' Murray? Christ, some people are gullible.

You do know they lost more at the hands of their own leader than Hitler, right?

If you don't like that, you'll like this even less. https://twitter.com/EmporersNewC/status/971368475422789633

Is this the first ever meta whoosh? Aside from the fact that 'Bert' wouldn't have been born during the second world war, didn't you get any inkling at all that the piece was satirising gormless Brexiteers who drone on about the war and the Germans as if Nazism only really came to an end with the referendum result?

Jumping gefilte fish - he's back! Calling Shylock to the Lounge...

Not forgetting May's 'red lines', most of which have been driven by the jihadists but not all (free movement, for example). This is what jihadists don't comprehend when they bleat about the EU trying the 'bully' May in the negotiations. The red lines themselves determine very precisely what deals with the EU are possible, and they are vanishingly small outside of a Canada-type FTA, which is barely worth the paper it's written on. The delusion is in refusing to accept this. But May will eventually run into the wall of reality, and that's only a few months off now.