whelk

4/11 to finish Top 6

Bookies now have us as 4th favourite to finish in Top 4

And don't forget if they had Pelle's goals instead of us things would be different

Good point. We must have been the team least in TV so far so will be good to show the world how brilliant we've been. Am I right in think we have only been on TV twice and lost both times?

Spurs taken 8 pts from last 9 games. We have taken 24pts. And they beat us!

Acceptable ;-)

Obviously both have been superb so far but if (hypothetically)we could only make one permanent who would you choose? For those of lesser minds this is hypothetical question so no need for 'pointless thread' or 'sign both' replies

Has anyone carried out correlation analysis that a victory follows? We might need the Kendall v Spearman debate again

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/southampton-vs-leicester-dusan-tadic-enjoying-free-football-at-southampton-having-gone-from-vojvodina-to-the-new-forest-9847194.html

I won't question Les's strategy. They realise they aren't reaching the maximum catchment and as it is deliberate I am fine with that.

And isn't it about time someone posted 'who cares as long as we win' yet?

Man City could implode. Unlikely but Kompany out and all does not seem well. 2nd spot it is then.

Just paper talk. Not going to happen. Mind they were right about the ghost children and big spiders

Pellegrini actually seems ok. No joy in him getting the boot.

You sure? Good writer but seems like the most miserable bloke on the planet.

I missed this at the time. Not that I could want them to fail more than I do but what a cvnt http://www.winnersports.co.uk/rodgers-does-not-feel-sorry-for-un-ambitious-southampton-fc-14383

Who Lawro? Maybe an honorary award for experimenting with fashion (shirts)

Tottenham are Morrisons

Agree he is flourishing in a role at West ham that he isn't going to get in England set up so not much to gain by his inclusion, however a sadder indictment would be if he was ignored. Aren't we always berating England for not picking form players at lesser clubs?

Yeah meaningless not opening up a gap on our rivals. Personally I am loving having a vested interest in so many games and supporting the minnows rather than wishing defeats on potential relegation rivals. More fun than just seeing if we can overtake Newcastle

All well and good theorising but who do we need other than cover players? Juan Mata on loan? Shaqiri is laughable.

Haven't seen article but many would think we have been lucky with injuries however ' Last year Southampton had the lowest incidence of soft tissue injuries in the Premier League, the clubs says, which is a result of their preventative care programmes.' Not to mention our special oxygen washing machines.

Sorry Bermuda I just think you still struggle to interpret 'the Southampton Way'

And this about injuries I haven't seen elsewhere : Last year Southampton had the lowest incidence of soft tissue injuries in the Premier League, the clubs says, which is a result of their preventative care programmes.

Naturally many articles from journos invited but haven't seen any quotes about the oxygen washing machines detailed by Reuters http://reut.rs/1shDfmI Last few paras if don't want to read the whole article